If you believe everything you read here that is what you might think...
The combustion is as general as you can get, the process requires CFD, chemistry, thermodynamics, engineering and a certain amount of luck to get right.Do you have any guesses as to why nailing pre-chamber combustion is so difficult? Is it a lack of precision on the engine management side? Is the combustion chamber geometry wrong? Valve timing profile? Honda has been making lots of upgrades to the fueling, induction, and exhaust systems, all of which are related to combustion.ringo wrote: ↑22 Sep 2017, 16:48I think the rules changes don't point to what is being done. The new rules are being proactive in preventing such things from being done.
I think oil burning is a non-story; just a distraction from the real performance differentiators; the combustion, MGUH and deployment scheduling.
I'm glad I'm not the only person with sense around here.ringo wrote: ↑22 Sep 2017, 16:48I think the rules changes don't point to what is being done. The new rules are being proactive in preventing such things from being done.
I think oil burning is a non-story; just a distraction from the real performance differentiators; the combustion, MGUH and deployment scheduling.
You can't burn more than 105 kilograms of fuel. That is illegal!
Hasegawa:
Asked if there would be any changes to the way of working with McLaren now the partnership is coming to an end, Hasegawa replied: "Yes. One of the points is we want to minimize the engine upgrades for the rest of the season, but that is because we'd like to get the maximum results within this year.
"Previously we just prioritized the performance improvement, because any improvement is continuing for next year, so we didn't need to hesitate to introduce upgrades. But now we won't be working together with Stoffel [Vandoorne] and Fernando [Alonso] next year, that means we want to concentrate on this year's results for McLaren.
"I prefer to score more points this year – I'd like to contribute to this team, most of all. But of course if we can get some huge upgrade then we don't need to wait and don't need to hesitate to take a penalty."
"We have another six races left, so we may introduce one more engine as a plan. That could maybe be in Malaysia, Suzuka or the U.S. [COTA]. From that point of view we will try and avoid the penalty in Suzuka obviously, and the U.S. could be a very good potential circuit for us based on the last year's results. So from that point of view Malaysia could be a chance but it's too soon to say. It will be difficult so I cannot confirm."
http://www.racer.com/f1/item/144413-hon ... -penalties
Damn it but almost sounds like no spec4 this year...HPD wrote: ↑23 Sep 2017, 04:11Hasegawa:
"We have another six races left, so we may introduce one more engine as a plan. That could maybe be in Malaysia, Suzuka or the U.S. [COTA]. From that point of view we will try and avoid the penalty in Suzuka obviously, and the U.S. could be a very good potential circuit for us based on the last year's results. So from that point of view Malaysia could be a chance but it's too soon to say. It will be difficult so I cannot confirm."
http://www.racer.com/f1/item/144413-hon ... -penalties
I agree with you. Now we have the spec 3.7 so the maximum we will see will be a 3.8 or 3.9
what do you know Marko? tell us .. mclaren chassis (? (it's a joke, relax)Helmut Marko: "We contacted Honda and did some research ourselves," explains the Red Bull Motorsportberater in an interview with ORF. "What Honda has told us, and what we have found out, makes us look optimistic about the future." As you can see from McLaren, both cars are in the top position (in the starting position in Singapore) 10, the engine is on the advance, and we know what is going on in the background. "
good stuff, i hope redbulll honda in 2019, cant wait.agree with you. Now we have the spec 3.7 so the maximum we will see will be a 3.8 or 3.9
2018 looks promising:
Helmut Marko: "We contacted Honda and did some research ourselves," explains the Red Bull Motorsportberater in an interview with ORF. "What Honda has told us, and what we have found out, makes us look optimistic about the future." As you can see from McLaren, both cars are in the top position (in the starting position in Singapore) 10, the engine is on the advance, and we know what is going on in the background. "
what do you know Marko? tell us .. mclaren chassis (? (it's a joke, relax)
That's what I've been trying to say all this time. Hasegawa-san's comment was so PC, very clever.restless wrote: ↑23 Sep 2017, 17:02Damn it but almost sounds like no spec4 this year...HPD wrote: ↑23 Sep 2017, 04:11Hasegawa:
"We have another six races left, so we may introduce one more engine as a plan. That could maybe be in Malaysia, Suzuka or the U.S. [COTA]. From that point of view we will try and avoid the penalty in Suzuka obviously, and the U.S. could be a very good potential circuit for us based on the last year's results. So from that point of view Malaysia could be a chance but it's too soon to say. It will be difficult so I cannot confirm."
http://www.racer.com/f1/item/144413-hon ... -penalties
That's what I've been trying to say all this time. Hasegawa-san's comment was so PC, very clever./quote]
what if honda bring the spec 4, they are trying to bring it malaysia. gives it more track testing and improve on it for next year.
This is a reactionary move by the FIA not a proactive one. There is definitely a significant role with lubricants that some manufacturers are using in the combustion process, not just in qualifying but at all times.ringo wrote: ↑22 Sep 2017, 16:48I think the rules changes don't point to what is being done. The new rules are being proactive in preventing such things from being done.
I think oil burning is a non-story; just a distraction from the real performance differentiators; the combustion, MGUH and deployment scheduling.