Lol...they are faster already whit Honda.
Lol...they are faster already whit Honda.
Mclaren just struggle at race pace. Otherwise I think they are almost 4th fastest. I think Perez also coudn't pass vandoorne if they have a bit more pace ( I think vandoorne forced and made a mistake there )
Lol...they are faster already whit Honda.
Let's wait till next year, to see what happens...Noone knows how things are gonna turn out ...i'm excited.techman wrote: ↑01 Oct 2017, 13:36Lol...they are faster already whit Honda.
do you know that honda engine package is much smaller than renault, which need more cooling, watch craig scarbs speak about it. mclaren will have to redesign their chassis to accomodate the bigger engine. the smalle engine that honda gives an advantage to mclaren but honda never get credit for this, this advantage will all dissappoer with renault engine.
Fernando said yesterday the new floor is not delivering as expected and the team was too quick to talk about it. We will see if they have it in both cars or not next week.Sayeman wrote: ↑01 Oct 2017, 13:11
Heard that Vandoorne is not running the upgraded aero this week, only Fernando is? Mclaren telling us that the aero has delivered as expected, so does that mean Alonso is not delivering or is Mclaren lying about the 95% correlation success? I really want to see how good this chassis is, so looking forward to next year.
They are too quick at everything except race trackf1universe wrote: ↑01 Oct 2017, 14:21Fernando said yesterday the new floor is not delivering as expected and the team was too quick to talk about it. We will see if they have it in both cars or not next week.Sayeman wrote: ↑01 Oct 2017, 13:11
Heard that Vandoorne is not running the upgraded aero this week, only Fernando is? Mclaren telling us that the aero has delivered as expected, so does that mean Alonso is not delivering or is Mclaren lying about the 95% correlation success? I really want to see how good this chassis is, so looking forward to next year.
Good job by Vandoorme and a little of bad luck for Alonso at the start, everyone on the left side had a slow start, isn't it?
Then why are RB sidepods and coke bottle area same or even smaller than Mcl?techman wrote: ↑01 Oct 2017, 13:36Lol...they are faster already whit Honda.
do you know that honda engine package is much smaller than renault, which need more cooling, watch craig scarbs speak about it. mclaren will have to redesign their chassis to accomodate the bigger engine. the smalle engine that honda gives an advantage to mclaren but honda never get credit for this, this advantage will all dissappoer with renault engine.
Then why are RB sidepods and coke bottle area same or even smaller than Mcl?
And yet, with all the knowledge and "know how" you continously provide here as "facts", you´re unable to answer directly the question. Instead you resort to post something already posted AND acknowledged by many here: That Mclaren will have difficulties adapting their chasis for the start of the 2018 season due to, *ahem* common sense, lack of experience with the Renault PU. (duh! )techman wrote: ↑01 Oct 2017, 15:26Then why are RB sidepods and coke bottle area same or even smaller than Mcl?
your are not an engineer but listen to craig scarbs, about the issues mclaren will have to face in 2019 with a renault engine package, redbull has been with renault for some time and their chassis is an evolution, mclaren will have to redesign from scratch and wont be easy. honda engine package was smaller thus giving mclaren an advantage in aero , even though honda never got the credit for this
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/13190 ... appens-now check the video around the 2.00 min mark.
So again, pray tell, how is it that RBR chasis back and sidepod area is as slim as Macca with that "huge" Renault PU?
https://i58.servimg.com/u/f58/14/79/55/26/c5sutg10.jpgtechman wrote: ↑01 Oct 2017, 16:15So again, pray tell, how is it that RBR chasis back and sidepod area is as slim as Macca with that "huge" Renault PU?
its not slim, your just biased because mclaren are going to run the renault. first check the video and see someone with knowledge explain this. you and i can say differently but craig scrabs explains it perfectly. craig scarbs is a reputed chassis/ aero technical analyst. listen to him when he talks about mclaren will need to make room to put the renault engine package compared to the smaller compact honda engine. and from all the renault running team. renault f1 work team is still lagging behind and TR is lagging behind redbull. redbull is the most efficient chassis due the the genius adrian newey. just imagine if redbull run a honda engine, that redbull will get more aero advantage from a smaller honda engine and adrian newey would be able shrink the chassis even further.
No actually is not that slim. Check it in the 3D (top rear side view) not just the top "cross line" at the back - look at the width through the whole vertical line where the engine is.Dipesh1995 wrote: ↑01 Oct 2017, 16:26https://i58.servimg.com/u/f58/14/79/55/26/c5sutg10.jpgtechman wrote: ↑01 Oct 2017, 16:15So again, pray tell, how is it that RBR chasis back and sidepod area is as slim as Macca with that "huge" Renault PU?
its not slim, your just biased because mclaren are going to run the renault. first check the video and see someone with knowledge explain this. you and i can say differently but craig scrabs explains it perfectly. craig scarbs is a reputed chassis/ aero technical analyst. listen to him when he talks about mclaren will need to make room to put the renault engine package compared to the smaller compact honda engine. and from all the renault running team. renault f1 work team is still lagging behind and TR is lagging behind redbull. redbull is the most efficient chassis due the the genius adrian newey. just imagine if redbull run a honda engine, that redbull will get more aero advantage from a smaller honda engine and adrian newey would be able shrink the chassis even further.
So you don’t think this is slim?