Some photos of 2017 PU
Oil tank and compressor inlet
Side view on compressor ala Merc position
piping from plenum to cylinders, 2 pipes per each bank, red arrow is regulator for wastegate
Copyright @ AlbertFabrega
I am deeply sorry we missed out on this. I read up on this today. My initial reaction was not to dig this back up to avoid annoying everybody, but I think in this case it is more than warranted.nzjrs wrote: ↑14 Sep 2017, 21:13Some of us try to have a level headed and calm discussion about the engine and the process of developing it. And you come here pissing all over the discussion and making it personal and about who is a fan of what. I encourage the mods to take a position on what sort of place they want to have here.ZakB wrote: ↑14 Sep 2017, 20:53It's a forum. You guys constantly get offended when Honda get's attacked. It's full of quotes from sources that are biased and every source that's critical is a liar. Stop acting like a bunch of fanboys. If McLaren produces a sh!t stain next year I will be the first to admit that, no problem at all. I don't see the point of defending a brand like your life depends on it.
It's a forum with rules in place that people have to abide to. This is a hardware topic, not your acid pit to dump your grievances about the lack of performance into. We allow some bits of off topic discussion, but if others are already telling you to quit it and discuss the topic's intent, then you should follow that advice. Just because a moderator is not interfering, does not mean you have a free pass on discussion anything that is not about the hardware of the PU.ZakB wrote:It's a forum
By how it works combustion is rapid as i have said above, zguru but rapid cobustion is different from the timing of that combustion. TJI will beat it in that regard. How does one time HCCI anyway?gruntguru wrote: ↑04 Oct 2017, 00:49The key benefit of HCCI is rapid combustion with completion very close to TDC.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑03 Oct 2017, 08:13Nope still slower. Even if HCCI ignites the whole the mixture at near the same Instant... You still have to wait to build up enough peak pressure to ignite in the first place. Just like deisel Poor or no control over ignition timing.ncassi22 wrote: ↑02 Oct 2017, 00:20
HCCI ignition is quicker than SI. Would the issue not be a control and excessive cylinder pressure issue? Ultra lean Lean HCCI can be assisted by TJI/CVCC to ignite reliably (Forced into HCCI mode). Nice thing about these MGU-H assisted turbos, are that you can get high boost pressures at lower RPM and load - maybe do psuedo HCCI in these lower reaches to increase economy.
Exaclty. You didnt finish reading my post!Rodak wrote: ↑04 Oct 2017, 03:07My first post here, so please be gentle. @ PlatinumZealot:Aren't the engine direct injection? Where would fuel puddle? It's going directly into the cylinders......rough finish is not for aerodynamics. But to prevent fuel from puddling on the walls. The V10 engines were showered in fuel from those port injectors so i assume that you want to prevent any coallescing which would happen on a smooth surface..
Isn't HCCI compression ignition of a petrol fueled engine? So the timing would largely be like a Diesel.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑05 Oct 2017, 12:45By how it works combustion is rapid as i have said above, zguru but rapid cobustion is different from the timing of that combustion. TJI will beat it in that regard. How does one time HCCI anyway?gruntguru wrote: ↑04 Oct 2017, 00:49The key benefit of HCCI is rapid combustion with completion very close to TDC.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑03 Oct 2017, 08:13Nope still slower. Even if HCCI ignites the whole the mixture at near the same Instant... You still have to wait to build up enough peak pressure to ignite in the first place. Just like deisel Poor or no control over ignition timing.
I'm pretty sure that's how the new Mazda line of engines will operate in their road cars.
As I remember They need at least one session for engine tuning so They must install engine before qual
HCCI with spark is not an HCCI anymore. Clearly TJI have an advantage here compared to low speed compression engine. As far as i know HCCI cannot be utilized at high load and high rpm because of fuel need to be ionized and reacted with O2 first and it takes time. No injector could handle very large amount of fuel with super short time at TDC at high speed. Even if there is, will classified as diesel and not as efficient as HCCI. For f1 engine, HCCI is a wet dream TBH
That's what is being talked about. HCCI mode in rpm range where it can operate, then it turns into spark ignition in the higher rpm range. It's still an HCCI engine in a given rev range where it actually operates as HCCI.Singabule wrote: ↑05 Oct 2017, 14:43HCCI with spark is not an HCCI anymore. Clearly TJI have an advantage here compared to low speed compression engine. As far as i know HCCI cannot be utilized at high load and high rpm because of fuel need to be ionized and reacted with O2 first and it takes time. No injector could handle very large amount of fuel with super short time at TDC at high speed. Even if there is, will classified as diesel and not as efficient as HCCI. For f1 engine, HCCI is a wet dream TBH
Do we have any ideas about what such RPM-ranges could be?dren wrote: ↑05 Oct 2017, 14:45That's what is being talked about. HCCI mode in rpm range where it can operate, then it turns into spark ignition in the higher rpm range. It's still an HCCI engine in a given rev range where it actually operates as HCCI.Singabule wrote: ↑05 Oct 2017, 14:43HCCI with spark is not an HCCI anymore. Clearly TJI have an advantage here compared to low speed compression engine. As far as i know HCCI cannot be utilized at high load and high rpm because of fuel need to be ionized and reacted with O2 first and it takes time. No injector could handle very large amount of fuel with super short time at TDC at high speed. Even if there is, will classified as diesel and not as efficient as HCCI. For f1 engine, HCCI is a wet dream TBH