Mmmm, BTW where are the Renault cars? It seems obvious to me the wishful thinking that McLaren has the same quality chassis like RedBull.
That's great info. So the PU weakness has improved to just being straight line speed/high end acceleration? Before it had issues all over including low end torque and general drivability.SameSame wrote: ↑29 Oct 2017, 22:54Finally some logic. The lower the percentage of full throttle per lap the better their package does. Mexico had a similar full throttle percentage to that of Hungary. Anyone that looked at the live timing would see them losing half a second in sector one alone to all the other teams and then claw more than that back in the last two sectors.DFX wrote: ↑29 Oct 2017, 19:35Your point being? As you said Mclaren does better in slow corners but not only, they have performed as good as the top teams in every high DF sector and in turns with fast change of direction. Every track with lower throttle application per lap, lower dependency on PU, was favorable for Mclaren and we can see, and heard from commentators, how well balanced Mclaren is under braking.j.yank wrote: ↑29 Oct 2017, 18:59
McLaren does better only in slow corners sectors with heavy stop\go events, while RedBull performs better in all sections and circuits. This doesn't speak well for the McLaren aero package. BTW, only one of the RedBulls got updated version of Renault engine this weekend, the other one seems elevated with McLaren. The sudden jump in McLaren-Honda performance cannot be explained only with their chassis, unless if you think that right now the McLaren chassis outperforms the top three teams at least by a second, which is highly doubtful.
The other RB had to change it's PU, take a close look at the Renault's that we know that dont have a great chassis and how they are performing in this track and compare with the RB's.
It appears to be the case. If I remember correctly, spec 3.7 had bring a marginal power gain but it's main focus was low end torque and drivability. In this area Honda appears to have come a long way.fellowhoodlums wrote: ↑30 Oct 2017, 00:08That's great info. So the PU weakness has improved to just being straight line speed/high end acceleration? Before it had issues all over including low end torque and general drivability.
What sudden jump in performance? There was no sudden jump in performance not at least compared to the other 'less full throttle' circuits like this one.j.yank wrote: ↑29 Oct 2017, 18:59McLaren does better only in slow corners sectors with heavy stop\go events, while RedBull performs better in all sections and circuits. This doesn't speak well for the McLaren aero package. BTW, only one of the RedBulls got updated version of Renault engine this weekend, the other one seems elevated with McLaren. The sudden jump in McLaren-Honda performance cannot be explained only with their chassis, unless if you think that right now the McLaren chassis outperforms the top three teams at least by a second, which is highly doubtful.ALO_Power wrote: ↑29 Oct 2017, 17:57It's amazing and funny in the same time how some people here spread stuff that McLaren is holding back the GREAT HONDA P.U. hahahaah
Sure sure guys. Also, let's not forget that McLaren seems to do better when Red Bull does, too. You see in this track, Red Bull almost got pole position....
Agreed, I'd also love to see Stoffel in a really competitive car as well, see him mix it with the big boys.
If you check qualification timings of MH and top teams and make corrections for the length of each circuit you will see that last two races McLaren-Honda perform significantly better, with the last qualification being the best performance for the last two seasons. In the race they had problems with the traffic, otherwise they would have also perform significantly better than any other race this season. Compare Alonso and Ocon times and you will see that when there were not a slow driver ahead, Alonso on average is faster 0.5 sec than Ocon. If he started little bit ahead on the grid I would guess that he would got the 5th place.Alonso Fan wrote: ↑30 Oct 2017, 01:40What sudden jump in performance? There was no sudden jump in performance not at least compared to the other 'less full throttle' circuits like this one.j.yank wrote: ↑29 Oct 2017, 18:59McLaren does better only in slow corners sectors with heavy stop\go events, while RedBull performs better in all sections and circuits. This doesn't speak well for the McLaren aero package. BTW, only one of the RedBulls got updated version of Renault engine this weekend, the other one seems elevated with McLaren. The sudden jump in McLaren-Honda performance cannot be explained only with their chassis, unless if you think that right now the McLaren chassis outperforms the top three teams at least by a second, which is highly doubtful.ALO_Power wrote: ↑29 Oct 2017, 17:57It's amazing and funny in the same time how some people here spread stuff that McLaren is holding back the GREAT HONDA P.U. hahahaah
Sure sure guys. Also, let's not forget that McLaren seems to do better when Red Bull does, too. You see in this track, Red Bull almost got pole position....
I did say after fp1 that Alonso looked mighty but I was comparing to last year and we know they had suspension issues and that the long straight hampered them more than this year. But when you compare to similar tracks this year the result and pace isn't a big surprise. Add in the fact that mexico has a lot of heavy braking zones which allow the battery to recharge more often and you see that it's no big deal.
Hopefully Brazil is similar
Something redbull ? I think redbull is best chassis or one of the best with Ferrari. They lost on power side.
It appears so. Coupled with the gains made from McLaren on the chassis side and they have become a real force. They mentioned trialing out new suspension elements. Sector 2 was medium speed corners and Sector 3 high speed; both of which they now seem to be on top of.fellowhoodlums wrote: ↑30 Oct 2017, 00:08That's great info. So the PU weakness has improved to just being straight line speed/high end acceleration? Before it had issues all over including low end torque and general drivability.
The bolded is a key point. Higher altitude=less air density=less drag=more work for the brakes to do slowing the car down from a higher top speed due to less drag. Therefore, more MGU-K recovery in comparison to MGU-H recovery as there is lower % full throttle also.Alonso Fan wrote: ↑30 Oct 2017, 01:40What sudden jump in performance? There was no sudden jump in performance not at least compared to the other 'less full throttle' circuits like this one.j.yank wrote: ↑29 Oct 2017, 18:59McLaren does better only in slow corners sectors with heavy stop\go events, while RedBull performs better in all sections and circuits. This doesn't speak well for the McLaren aero package. BTW, only one of the RedBulls got updated version of Renault engine this weekend, the other one seems elevated with McLaren. The sudden jump in McLaren-Honda performance cannot be explained only with their chassis, unless if you think that right now the McLaren chassis outperforms the top three teams at least by a second, which is highly doubtful.ALO_Power wrote: ↑29 Oct 2017, 17:57It's amazing and funny in the same time how some people here spread stuff that McLaren is holding back the GREAT HONDA P.U. hahahaah
Sure sure guys. Also, let's not forget that McLaren seems to do better when Red Bull does, too. You see in this track, Red Bull almost got pole position....
I did say after fp1 that Alonso looked mighty but I was comparing to last year and we know they had suspension issues and that the long straight hampered them more than this year. But when you compare to similar tracks this year the result and pace isn't a big surprise. Add in the fact that mexico has a lot of heavy braking zones which allow the battery to recharge more often and you see that it's no big deal.
Hopefully Brazil is similar
Why on earth will either of those teams hire him?