Was that not a Pirelli advert a few ears back?shady wrote: ↑26 Jan 2018, 22:04I know its jokes... however for every action there is an equal and opposite.
The cars are pushing against the ground and the ground is pushing back; thats how they move. I actually think its in the regulations.
e: it is..
1.3 Land vehicle :
A locomotive device propelled by its own means, moving by constantly taking real support on
the earth's surface, of which the propulsion and steering are under the control of a driver
aboard the vehicle.
don't hold your breath he said spec 4 is a pleasant surprise few months agoGhostF1 wrote: ↑26 Jan 2018, 02:40This quote fascinates me. That's a super confident claim, especially while they are still trying to reach a strong baseline, but I never underestimate the Japanese, especially a company as large as this with as much pressure that's in been faced with. I'm hoping for an enormous reaction! I'm very excited to see what Honda pulls out of the hat this yearWazari wrote: ↑22 Jan 2018, 22:24Yes I meant the "boxer" engine camshafts. Some of you are spot on on your assumptions.
I hear that dyno testing is going well in terms of reliability and efficiency. After accomplishing those targets comes power. The baseline for the 618 is done and running. They are many more innovations in the pipeline which I highly doubt the other manufacturers will have in 2018 or ever for that matter, that Honda will try and fully incorporate by mid-season.
I would like to see the fuel flow limit go away and allow refueling during a race. This is racing....????.
"Spec 4" could have been implemented last season but for a myriad of reasons it was not.loner wrote: ↑26 Jan 2018, 23:05don't hold your breath he said spec 4 is a pleasant surprise few months agoGhostF1 wrote: ↑26 Jan 2018, 02:40This quote fascinates me. That's a super confident claim, especially while they are still trying to reach a strong baseline, but I never underestimate the Japanese, especially a company as large as this with as much pressure that's in been faced with. I'm hoping for an enormous reaction! I'm very excited to see what Honda pulls out of the hat this yearWazari wrote: ↑22 Jan 2018, 22:24Yes I meant the "boxer" engine camshafts. Some of you are spot on on your assumptions.
I hear that dyno testing is going well in terms of reliability and efficiency. After accomplishing those targets comes power. The baseline for the 618 is done and running. They are many more innovations in the pipeline which I highly doubt the other manufacturers will have in 2018 or ever for that matter, that Honda will try and fully incorporate by mid-season.
I would like to see the fuel flow limit go away and allow refueling during a race. This is racing....????.
![]()
like they say.. when i see it i'll believe it , would be a great karma between RBR and Mclaren though![]()
As Mr. Eastwood would say, do you feel lucky, punk ?
Leaving us no choice but to guess, I think similar step forward Renault made from 2015 to ~middle of 2016, with more to come ~ summer break. If the Toro Rosso can make it to the upper midfield by years end it'll be an accomplishment but not an unrealistic one. 2018 probably has the most pressure to perform than any other year, and not just for Honda.Wazari wrote: ↑26 Jan 2018, 23:35"Spec 4" could have been implemented last season but for a myriad of reasons it was not.loner wrote: ↑26 Jan 2018, 23:05don't hold your breath he said spec 4 is a pleasant surprise few months agoGhostF1 wrote: ↑26 Jan 2018, 02:40
This quote fascinates me. That's a super confident claim, especially while they are still trying to reach a strong baseline, but I never underestimate the Japanese, especially a company as large as this with as much pressure that's in been faced with. I'm hoping for an enormous reaction! I'm very excited to see what Honda pulls out of the hat this year.
![]()
like they say.. when i see it i'll believe it , would be a great karma between RBR and Mclaren though![]()
The baseline for the 618's numbers is an improvement over the most recent 617. I can't go into specifics.
"Innovations" have to do with the ICE's components and ERS processes.
Not unrealistic but rather optimistic in my opinion. Upper midfield, that would be Renault and Force India. Given the driver line-up, experience, stability, resources (Renault) and PU (Force India) I think it will be unlikely for Toro Rosso to beat them over the season, or even match them at the end of the season performance wise. It's been a while since Toro Rosso truely had a great car - the beginning of 2015. I think beating Williams, Haas and Sauber will be as good as can be reasonably be expected.godlameroso wrote: ↑27 Jan 2018, 01:32
Leaving us no choice but to guess, I think similar step forward Renault made from 2015 to ~middle of 2016, with more to come ~ summer break. If the Toro Rosso can make it to the upper midfield by years end it'll be an accomplishment but not an unrealistic one. 2018 probably has the most pressure to perform than any other year, and not just for Honda.
well perhaps you do live on cloud number 9 claiming innovations in the pipeline that you highly doubt the other manufacturers will have in 2018 or ever for that matterWazari wrote: ↑26 Jan 2018, 23:35"Spec 4" could have been implemented last season but for a myriad of reasons it was not.loner wrote: ↑26 Jan 2018, 23:05don't hold your breath he said spec 4 is a pleasant surprise few months agoGhostF1 wrote: ↑26 Jan 2018, 02:40
This quote fascinates me. That's a super confident claim, especially while they are still trying to reach a strong baseline, but I never underestimate the Japanese, especially a company as large as this with as much pressure that's in been faced with. I'm hoping for an enormous reaction! I'm very excited to see what Honda pulls out of the hat this year.
![]()
like they say.. when i see it i'll believe it , would be a great karma between RBR and Mclaren though![]()
The baseline for the 618's numbers is an improvement over the most recent 617. I can't go into specifics.
"Innovations" have to do with the ICE's components and ERS processes.
Surely this was what Asaki meant, when he said he wanted half a season to demonstrate all the power of this PU. Start reliably and add power ("innovations") with the updates.
Marko: "Honda is very active and has already found something. Maybe they manage to be on the level of Renault with the second engine. Honda had to compromise on the McLaren chassis specification. They could not develop freely and were pretty limited."
https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/for ... 11539.html
I don't live on cloud number 9 but I hear it is a nice neighborhood. "Ever" meaning under this current PU formula (2020). We now have a very good idea what the other 3 have been doing with regards to what people are calling "TJI" although it's really not TJI but similar, and what HRD will bring with it's on unique combustion process that cannot be easily duplicated.loner wrote: ↑27 Jan 2018, 14:54well perhaps you do live on cloud number 9 claiming innovations in the pipeline that you highly doubt the other manufacturers will have in 2018 or ever for that matter
i'll believe it when i see it.
Wazari, what makes you believe Mercedes for instance are using a similar process to TJI rather than "it's on unique combustion process that cannot be easily duplicated."?Wazari wrote: ↑28 Jan 2018, 01:03I don't live on cloud number 9 but I hear it is a nice neighborhood. "Ever" meaning under this current PU formula (2020). We now have a very good idea what the other 3 have been doing with regards to what people are calling "TJI" although it's really not TJI but similar, and what HRD will bring with it's on unique combustion process that cannot be easily duplicated.