http://f1.racing-live.com/en/index.html ... 1439.shtml
A source said on the weekend that the BAR/Button relationship turned South when the Formula One team refused to honour verbal 'performance bonus' commitments.
A source said on the weekend that the BAR/Button relationship turned South when the Formula One team refused to honour verbal 'performance bonus' commitments.
This is wierd, I read about this bonus agreement earlier. Wich is funny because BAR is shouting people should keep to their commitments... everything seems to have a double bottom in this case. They are acting like a group of children creating soccer teams in the park...Anonymous wrote:Oh, it's about money afterall.
http://f1.racing-live.com/en/index.html ... 1439.shtml
A source said on the weekend that the BAR/Button relationship turned South when the Formula One team refused to honour verbal 'performance bonus' commitments.
sharkie17 wrote:Richards insist that JB will be treated fairly this weekend. Apparently, JB is scared that he might not be well received by his team this weekend... YOU THINK?
But wouldn't that be awesome for 2005? You'll get the Schumi/Hakkinen rivalry, old/young Finn, Kimi/Montoya and Webber/Button all for 2005! Now if we can only get a front grid as close as the Michellin teams this year.I can't see any other option in the market that will be able to do the same, instantly, except Hakkinen and, even this one is a risky (and probably costy) decision.
Yeah, that should be fantastic, of course... provided that Hakkinen wouldn't finish 30 sec. behind Schumi and that the struggles would not only be for 3rd place...Anonymous wrote:But wouldn't that be awesome for 2005? You'll get the Schumi/Hakkinen rivalry, old/young Finn, Kimi/Montoya and Webber/Button all for 2005! Now if we can only get a front grid as close as the Michellin teams this year.