Apparently DC thinks Hamilton will quit in 2020, so at best two more seasons of him potentially.
That's easy. If he wins this year, he'll take another 2 year deal with Mercedes and hope to match Michael's 7 title record. That's a huge motivation. Even if he fails to match Michael, he'll want to ensure he leaves F1 with a record that can't be matched for a few years. Vettel and he are likely to retire at the same time, give or take a season - being "the best since Schumacher" would sit well with both and neither would want the other to be that man. Being the best ever - in terms of stats at least - is motivation for every racing driver.
If Trump's suggestion of a big tariff on German cars materialises, I would think that Mercedes won't be too worried about the US revenue. They'd probably favour more races in non-US places instead.Fulcrum wrote: ↑04 Jun 2018, 16:18
One significant point against this argument is the potential for teams to turn profits, based on new redistribution of monies from Liberty, increased revenue from the US (if it materialises), increased revenue from OTT streaming (if it materialises), etc... Of course, these are hypothetical profits. Small money for Mercedes, so it might not make much difference in the end.
I was referring to revenue in the form of TV rights, viewership and so forth; i.e. things that impact F1 directly, not car sales.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑04 Jun 2018, 16:43If Trump's suggestion of a big tariff on German cars materialises, I would think that Mercedes won't be too worried about the US revenue. They'd probably favour more races in non-US places instead.Fulcrum wrote: ↑04 Jun 2018, 16:18
One significant point against this argument is the potential for teams to turn profits, based on new redistribution of monies from Liberty, increased revenue from the US (if it materialises), increased revenue from OTT streaming (if it materialises), etc... Of course, these are hypothetical profits. Small money for Mercedes, so it might not make much difference in the end.
Mercedes are only in F1 to use it as a shop window to raise brand awareness and sell cars. Given the choice between TV revenues in the US (where they might have little market available if tariffs are applied) or elsewhere where their cars can be sold [relatively] tariff free, where would they rather go? TV revenues are probably less than car market revenues in most countries.Fulcrum wrote: ↑04 Jun 2018, 16:59I was referring to revenue in the form of TV rights, viewership and so forth; i.e. things that impact F1 directly, not car sales.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑04 Jun 2018, 16:43If Trump's suggestion of a big tariff on German cars materialises, I would think that Mercedes won't be too worried about the US revenue. They'd probably favour more races in non-US places instead.Fulcrum wrote: ↑04 Jun 2018, 16:18
One significant point against this argument is the potential for teams to turn profits, based on new redistribution of monies from Liberty, increased revenue from the US (if it materialises), increased revenue from OTT streaming (if it materialises), etc... Of course, these are hypothetical profits. Small money for Mercedes, so it might not make much difference in the end.
You probably never heard of Niki Lauda...
Which is why I suggested:Just_a_fan wrote: ↑04 Jun 2018, 19:05Mercedes are only in F1 to use it as a shop window to raise brand awareness and sell cars. Given the choice between TV revenues in the US (where they might have little market available if tariffs are applied) or elsewhere where their cars can be sold [relatively] tariff free, where would they rather go? TV revenues are probably less than car market revenues in most countries.Fulcrum wrote: ↑04 Jun 2018, 16:59I was referring to revenue in the form of TV rights, viewership and so forth; i.e. things that impact F1 directly, not car sales.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑04 Jun 2018, 16:43
If Trump's suggestion of a big tariff on German cars materialises, I would think that Mercedes won't be too worried about the US revenue. They'd probably favour more races in non-US places instead.
Mercedes ROI from F1 has likely been positive up to now. 'New' tech investment, a free marketing campaign; better technology for their road cars, better brand awareness, more sales. By 2020, all of the benefits will have plateaud, with or without Trump tariffs, with or without continued dominance in the sport.Once they've achieved what they want - generally a return on investment - or not - e.g. Toyota - boards simply cut the cord.
what on earth are you talking about.FrukostScones wrote: ↑04 Jun 2018, 21:14You probably never heard of Niki Lauda...
Don't address me if all you have to say is disrespecful tosh.
he means that Lauda "retired" after the 1979 season and made a comeback for the 1982 season.Manoah2u wrote: ↑05 Jun 2018, 10:04what on earth are you talking about.FrukostScones wrote: ↑04 Jun 2018, 21:14You probably never heard of Niki Lauda...
Don't address me if all you have to say is disrespecful tosh.
i'll adress whatever i want in an open board.
you bring up Rosberg and Hamilton @ Ferrari.
that makes zero sense with a retired Rosberg whom has zero intention of returning to F1,
especially alongside former archrival Hamilton.
Such a rather curious statement obviously raises some questions.
But be my guest, show me a link where Niki Lauda makes such a bold claim.