M840TR wrote: ↑03 Jun 2018, 19:04
Big Tea wrote: ↑03 Jun 2018, 18:03
GoranF1 wrote: ↑03 Jun 2018, 17:00
It doesnt work for me
That was my immediate thoughts too. He seems to only have experience in tin racing and endurance. I think it is far different to F1.
But then, there are a lot of smart people in Mclaren and they should know which way is up.
These lot of smart people need to nail a design philosophy and stick to it. Ever since 2010 they come up with something different. It's reminiscent of Lotus back in their championship winning years. Stability, if on right path, is what can be crucial in the end. Redbull and Merc have displayed this since 2010 and Ferrari recently.
I personally think the new direction this year with the nose change has plenty of potential to take the challenge to the top 3
But you can not develop a design principle if it does not work. Refine year after year if you have a good platform, but putting lipstick on a pig just gives you a glamorous pig.
I think it is also the other way around. They do not decide on a model to follow and go out looking for the guru of that ethos, they bring in someone with either a proven record in that style or just someone who has been successful and adapt your design to their knowledge and experience.
If it is someone who had success on the coat tails of another, then those who do the choosing should get advice before drawing up a contract, or they will be in trouble. So did Williams snatch at a glittering prize without studying it?
Does not seem likely, but something is not right
When arguing with a fool, be sure the other person is not doing the same thing.