WaikeCU wrote: ↑30 Jul 2018, 12:14
I don't think anyone can match Lewis in wet or changing circumstances at the moment. So whenever it's wet conditions, be on the lookout for that #44 Merc in front.
Yes, one can certainly agree with that, especially in the Merc. Vettel also had his awesome moments in the wet in the past, but this was in a different car.
WaikeCU wrote: ↑30 Jul 2018, 12:14
Mistake of Vettel in Hockenheim was a vital moment during the season imo. It triggered a change in momentum somehow. I mean talk about a 4 time World Champion bottling it in front of his home crowd all because of his own mistake.
No, the change in momentum is an assumption, that does not make sense at all. Based on nothing.
But of course, it was a vital moment for the WDC as it cost 32 points not to win and to gift at least one position to Ham. Without putting the car in the wall, Vettel would go to Spa and Monza, both tracks that should favor the Ferrari, with a good lead and not a big deficit.
WaikeCU wrote: ↑30 Jul 2018, 12:14
In Hungary he clearly had the quickest car on track, but he was nowhere in Quali. During the race he couldn't benefit of the quicker tire due to the mistakes of his own team and it almost cost him the race when Bottas collided with him.
Nowhere in Qualli is a bit strange...the track was developing by nearly one second per lap at this point and Vettel was more than a minute too early on the track. Judging the circumstances, the four top cars were on par in Q3 and it could have been much closer without Rai ending in traffic and Vet running too early. Big errors in the strategy there as well...
WaikeCU wrote: ↑30 Jul 2018, 12:14
The Ferrari is however, the quickest car imo.
Depends on the track. In Silverstone the Merc was clearly quicker. We will have two tracks that should suit the Ferrari and then two that should suit the Merc. With the comfortable lead and two Nr2 drivers that are not on par, it should be save for Ham. I do not see much chance for Vet to compensate the deficit he got in Hockenheim.