Where did you get that McLaren was second slower on the long runs? Lando's run yesterday had him do 1:23s on C1 for 26 laps (last stint). TR/Sauber did not such stints. Their longer stints were on softer tires, Alfa wasn't matching 1:23s on neither C2 nor C3, while Toro Rosso was a bit faster using C3 and even then it was not much faster (avg of low 1:23s).
That stint on the C1s suggests you should disregard all of McLarens long runs as a measure of pace. If you're taking it at face value and tyre corrected, they are ahead of the midfield. We should be cautious making any predictions.
How do u explain the fact that Mclaren for past few years always had the best S3 times compared to competiton with the same stiff suspension?Xero wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 12:42That stint on the C1s suggests you should disregard all of McLarens long runs as a measure of pace. If you're taking it at face value and tyre corrected, they are ahead of the midfield. We should be cautious making any predictions.
The slower S3 doesn't suggest a low downforce setup, but stiffer suspension, which sacrifices slow speed grip and traction for a more stable and predictable aero platform. It's been a trait for McLaren for many years now. S3 is all about mechanical grip.
You are looking way too much into those stints. We do not know if Lando used old tires, did he make a mistake by pushing too hard on first few laps or if they changed his engine mode.McMika98 wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 12:50How do u explain the fact that Mclaren for past few years always had the best S3 times compared to competiton with the same stiff suspension?
The pace drop off after few laps is alarming, compare Albons lap to Lando on same tyre. Albon had a much longer stint so was probably fully loaded with fuel.
They were slow in S3 last year too, the rear of the car was all over the place. The year before that they did have much better mechanical grip, they built a really decent chassis that year, hence the better times. I can agree with what you allude to though, McLaren can afford to slap on more downforce than they currently have. You have to look back to the Mercedes days since they could afford the luxury, gives them good scope this season, a proper solid base to build upon.
If you take the last long run there was zero drop off over 26 laps, with really competitive times. Before that run, yes, the pace could have been seen as concerning. Factor in setup work and building an understanding of the car, it's improving all the time. Let's not be too haste to judge.
I think its moved now to the one of the Pireli test days that the teams are doing but I'm not sure on thischarliesmithhd wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 14:53Will there be a wet simulation day, I remember before they had trucks spraying water on the track
https://www.mclaren.com/formula1/team/m ... james-key/McLaren Racing confirms start date for James Key
An agreement has been made to settle the position
McLaren Racing and Scuderia Toro Rosso confirm they have reached an agreement to settle the position of Mr James Key, who will be released by Scuderia Toro Rosso prior to the end of his existing contract arrangement on 23 March 2019.
James will begin his role as Technical Director, McLaren F1, on 25 March 2019.
every time I saw the car they didn't use drs, also Lando's speed traps were a bit slower than others' fastest which suggests they didn't use drs
Thanks, other teams like STR did use on their long runs, right?charliesmithhd wrote: ↑22 Feb 2019, 17:25every time I saw the car they didn't use drs, also Lando's speed traps were a bit slower than others' fastest which suggests they didn't use drs