SmallSoldier wrote: ↑01 Apr 2019, 03:42
GhostF1 wrote:That video has been posted around several topics being used as a highlight for "how good Renault is compared to Honda".. What I find interesting is down the straight, the Renault has a 2kph advantage on a car with less downforce and with a better getaway from last corner, during the mid section of the track, again, with traction issues, the Honda catches up.
If anything this highlights the performance of the Honda as opposed to the Renault pushing around a lower downforce car that had better traction on this weekend. We should consider all variables before claiming false truths..
I also don't need to bring up the whole "2 race weekends, 3 Renault failures" do I? No use being quick if all your components are used up before we even get back to Barcelona.
I’m sure no one will deny that Honda’s reliability has been top notch! And that Renault is lagging behind in that department so far in the season... In that regard Honda is doing awesome and surprising many... If Red Bull’s move to Honda was for reliability, so far it could be considered a success.
I believe the other point of the story are the comments (by Red Bull) that Honda was a more powerful engine than Renault and that it had better drivability... The results so far seem to show that might not be the case.
Red Bull beat both Haas and Mclaren by less than a tenth of a second in Qualifying... If the Honda engine is better than Renault’s, does that mean that Mclaren has built a better chassis than Red Bull?
Ultimately is very early in the season, Red Bull will surely improve and bring updates to it’s the car... The question is if they will bring more performance than the rest and if they will recover what was a very hefty gap to the midfield as they have had for the last 4 years... Today they seem uncomfortably closer to the midfield... China will provide another set of data for us to understand the different car’s potential and what their trend is for the rest of the season.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I see where you're going with that, but again it doesn't tell the whole story. It's not just about who has the better PU or who has the better overall chassis, a lot is dependent on tyre management. This is something they struggled with for the whole weekend on the C3 tyre. Max was only marginally quicker on it than the C2 and Horner said they are having issues finding the right window for it. Regarding quali times.. Max has admitted to a mistake on the final corner, you can hear/see him take two goes at throttle application after correcting his turn in angle, he claims he lost a number of tenths there, so if we want to believe that, he's also rght up Bottas' alley. If we take Melbourne into account as well, Max was half a second clear of the next best (Haas) and a second clear of McLaren. We can see potential, Bahrain just didn't work for them.
On this weekend, I would happily agree with the statement that McLaren did a better job managing their tyres to get them into the correct windows. Much like Mercedes have had tracks where their tyre performance has been sub-par, same for Ferrari. We know they have top tier engines and chassis'. It's down to how the car is setup also, on this occasion I think it's fairly obvious they didn't do a good enough job.
I think its premature to blame Honda, their showing in Melbourne made that abundantly clear and we have an outfit who openly admit their chassis is not optimal at the moment, their claims that Honda have provided an excellent package? At this stage, I see no reason to doubt that claim.