Make an effort to watch this video.LM10 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2019, 10:29Hamilton did purple times in S1 and S2, but he was not even half a tenth faster in S1 and less than a tenth in both sectors combined. Where did you get your numbers from?
Make an effort to watch this video.LM10 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2019, 10:29Hamilton did purple times in S1 and S2, but he was not even half a tenth faster in S1 and less than a tenth in both sectors combined. Where did you get your numbers from?
Bottas will be soon in 4th as he will likely just breeze past Ricciardo and Gasly (Due to this being an overtake track and the difference between the Mercedes and the other 2) that will negate the ‘help’ Vettel gets.Phil wrote: ↑09 Jun 2019, 10:15Hamilton was up 1.5 tenths after S1, again purple in S2, but he in the end only beat his previous time by a few hundreths, so there must have been a mistake somewhere in S3.
Even so, he gotten beaten by Seb by 2 tenths plus, who was nearly as quick in S1 and S2, so i dont think it would have made a difference. It just would have been even closer.
Seriously, awesome lap and performance by Vettel. I still think though that Mercedes/Hamilton will be very hard to beat. Hamilton just loves these type of races. Ferrari are in a good position though to use Leclerc to help Vettel win the race.
That time doesn't match this ?GPR -A wrote: ↑09 Jun 2019, 10:37Make an effort to watch this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RBuENbhs4I
He is trying to say Hamilton lost 1/10s in S3 compared to his first Q3 run, and not compared to Vettel's Q3 run.Unc1eM0nty wrote: ↑09 Jun 2019, 11:37That time doesn't match this ?GPR -A wrote: ↑09 Jun 2019, 10:37Make an effort to watch this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RBuENbhs4I
https://serving.photos.photobox.com/653 ... dd718c.jpg
https://www.fia.com/file/82063/downloadGPR -A wrote: ↑09 Jun 2019, 10:37Make an effort to watch this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RBuENbhs4I
I wasn't comparing it to Vettel, I was comparing Hamilton's 2nd Q3 run with Hamilton 1st Q3 run. Step by step:
I've read exactly the opposite of this. So now what's the truth?atanatizante wrote: ↑08 Jun 2019, 23:561. AMuS said Merc and Williams were running with lower engine modes in qualy until they find the reason behind Racing Point engine failure, which btw. received a fresh spec.1 PU ... in the speed traps Merc and Williams were quite down and Racing Point traditionally went for a low downforce setup hence their better top speeds ...
Things don't work in a vacuum Phil, you know Lewis would have been the first to say that he made a mistake in S3 if he'd made a mistake. Everything in a qualifying lap builds to a total, and you don't run one sector separate to others. It's all one lap. It's why we rarely ever see theoretical best laps be the final qualifying time.Phil wrote: ↑09 Jun 2019, 13:00
Still, as I said previously, Vettel delivered a superb lap - while he was slower than Lewis in S1 and S2, he was only narrowly slower. In S3 where the Ferrari was fastest all along, he pulled out the gap. Now, all I'm saying is that Lewis would have been closer [to Vettel] and that he indeed did make some mistake in S3 (relative to his own previous best in that sector) but I'm quite sure even if he had been faultless, he would have barely missed out on pole anyway.
Vettel's lap was really really good and he was close enough to the Hamilton/Mercedes in S1 and S2 - that was key.
As someone said, VER would easily snatch third, no question.digitalrurouni wrote: ↑09 Jun 2019, 16:29I'm really happy that Danny Ricardo qualified such a good position in the Renault. But I somehow feel that position would not have been his if Max verstappen did not have his trouble during qualifying. I also don't think he will be holding on to that place for long in the race.
All they need is to have decent race pace and not concede track position to HAM at the start.