2-1 and HAM allows Bottas to have some fun!
About the Honda motor, from what I've read the spec3 delta was ~10 HP. I wouldn't be surprised if Honda is actually behind Mercedes, Ferarri and yes... Renault in terms of raw speed.
2-1 and HAM allows Bottas to have some fun!
not because they didn't deliver in 5 years ?!!Bill wrote: ↑24 Jun 2019, 11:53When you qualify one second behind the leader and you only equal Mclaren in the corners then you know power is the least of your problems. How much is Honda behind 10hp 20hp 100hp . Ferrari still has fuel issues in race Renault can't run high engine mode for longer like Honda can do . The Japanese are hard on themselves they won't be satisfied until they are number 1 they are obsessive about it as Marquez reiterated in moto gp.personally I think Honda are doing relatively ok people are just taking their frustrations on them because they are easy target.if Honda leave then what u think Rbr will magically become fastest with Renault or Ferrari engine
advertising got a million face.. and i couldn't care less , they just need to deliver.dxpetrov wrote: ↑24 Jun 2019, 12:38There is no such thing as Honda Team in current F1. The name of the team is Red Bull Racing and it seams that a lot of people had moved into this tread for the wrong reason. Honda is just an engine supplier, with a premium contract with RBR. They got no influence on anything internally and strategically within RBR, other than to bring that propulsion force at the back of the car.
People said RB was a failure?HPD wrote: ↑24 Jun 2019, 14:04The people have to calm down. At the beginning of the year people said that RB Honda would be a failure. And they are still the third best team. It is not enough but they are still a great team.
Austria will be difficult, even harder than France. Do not expect miracles, we lack power and chassis.
If we can not run with low downforce like the others, we will be slow on the straights.. This does not have a solution for the next races, just accept it..
For the fans of Renault and Mclaren I tell them that these teams are doing a good job, Renault also has a good engine. But as a team, he still needs a lot to fight with RB. Try not to dirty the thread, RB Honda is still fighting against Ferrari, not against Mclaren or Renault. (No offense)
Max deserves to be a champion with RB or another team. He is a great pilot.PowerandtheGlory wrote: ↑24 Jun 2019, 14:20RB will be safely 3rd this year.. thanks to Max, but if they don’t win a race.. I wonder if it triggers Max’s performance clause in his contract....
During the break before qualifying, the engineers decided at short notice to rebuild the setup at the last minute. More downforce was the motto. "With the flatter wings, we lost more in the turns than we won on the straights," said Red Bull sports director Helmut Marko.
https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/for ... in-schach/
point is both parties underestimated the steps taken by Mercedes and Ferrari in the winter,as been said by Marko..Ground Effect wrote: ↑24 Jun 2019, 14:30I wonder why people are so obsessed with power when the car is clearly having issues. Truth be told, Red Bull build excellent chassis, so it's easy to automatically think that if Red Bull have a problem, it must be with the engine. When a driver says, I have no grip, the rear is unstable, how can that be a problem for the engine. Haas struggled with grip, is anybody wondering about the PU? Williams?? I think it's safe to say that Ferrari and Mercedes are still ahead, no argument there. Red Bull are no strangers to winning races with less power than their rivals, because they've usually had a good chassis. So even if Red Bull has less power than the top 2, which has always been the case, the real reason they're not challenging for wins is because they built a car that, by their high standards, isn't good enough. After all, Red Bull told Honda get us within x amount of HP, we'll do the rest. From all I've heard from Red Bull, Marko, Max, Horner, they've all said Honda delivered as promised.
I agree. The chassis needs improvement. Can you imagen the result of Max when he would have had RB14's rear last weekend? Just take a look:Ground Effect wrote: ↑24 Jun 2019, 14:30I wonder why people are so obsessed with power when the car is clearly having issues. Truth be told, Red Bull build excellent chassis, so it's easy to automatically think that if Red Bull have a problem, it must be with the engine. When a driver says, I have no grip, the rear is unstable, how can that be a problem for the engine. Haas struggled with grip, is anybody wondering about the PU? Williams?? I think it's safe to say that Ferrari and Mercedes are still ahead, no argument there. Red Bull are no strangers to winning races with less power than their rivals, because they've usually had a good chassis. So even if Red Bull has less power than the top 2, which has always been the case, the real reason they're not challenging for wins is because they built a car that, by their high standards, isn't good enough. After all, Red Bull told Honda get us within x amount of HP, we'll do the rest. From all I've heard from Red Bull, Marko, Max, Horner, they've all said Honda delivered as promised.
Why not read the whole quote? Max is asking for more power AND more car upgrade. In this race, he specifically said they added down force to settle the rear and sacrificed the straight. We could easily ignore the first part of his quote and say 'Max IS asking for more car upgrade'.
I know it's translated from a cyrillic, which means that either google, or the available letters, apparently can't reproduce the double o sound of Dutch, but, it's Doornbos._cerber1 wrote: ↑24 Jun 2019, 15:18The former pilot of Red Bull, and now Ziggo Sport analyst Robert Dornbos ...
https://autosport.com.ru/f1/57264-rober ... adinyh-sil
Very good pictures. Enormous difference in RW.seense wrote: ↑24 Jun 2019, 15:25I agree. The chassis needs improvement. Can you imagen the result of Max when he would have had RB14's rear last weekend? Just take a look:Ground Effect wrote: ↑24 Jun 2019, 14:30I wonder why people are so obsessed with power when the car is clearly having issues. Truth be told, Red Bull build excellent chassis, so it's easy to automatically think that if Red Bull have a problem, it must be with the engine. When a driver says, I have no grip, the rear is unstable, how can that be a problem for the engine. Haas struggled with grip, is anybody wondering about the PU? Williams?? I think it's safe to say that Ferrari and Mercedes are still ahead, no argument there. Red Bull are no strangers to winning races with less power than their rivals, because they've usually had a good chassis. So even if Red Bull has less power than the top 2, which has always been the case, the real reason they're not challenging for wins is because they built a car that, by their high standards, isn't good enough. After all, Red Bull told Honda get us within x amount of HP, we'll do the rest. From all I've heard from Red Bull, Marko, Max, Horner, they've all said Honda delivered as promised.
RB14 Paul Ricard
https://c8.alamy.com/comp/P57429/circui ... P57429.jpg
RB15 Paul Ricard
https://verstappen.nl/img/2019/Formule_ ... 27-20b.jpg