This article by Mark Hughes http://www.itv-f1.com/Feature.aspx?Type ... s&id=43892 seems to suggest McLaren's advantage over Ferrari in wet conditions are (at least partially) down to the way it maintains tyre temperature.
He says "At this stage of the race the McLaren had vastly more grip than the Ferrari because of the way the red car loses dry tyre temperature far more quickly and totally than the McLaren in wet conditions."
Would this really make such a difference in performance to explain Hamilton's advantage in the wet? Certainly, considering Kimi himself is no muck in the wet, I did think it would be some setup compromise that explains the huge difference in lap times compared to McLaren vs Ferrari in the wet.
If tyre temperature is the case, is this linked to the fundamental chassis used by Ferrari and something they cannot improve over the rest of the season?
I would like to understand this area more, if someone has a good idea.
Thanks!