This rebirth of the team is such a pleasure
They should finish 4th this year, I'm hoping for continuous progress and be closer to the top teams next year
mwillems wrote: ↑04 Aug 2019, 18:10It has been spoken openly as far as I remember, that the owners were supplementing the budget after the Honda split, from their own pockets and from sale of Assets, such as historic race cars. So it is entirely possible that any extra sponsorship may at first cover this amount. Now whether this was already resolved by the Latifi share purchase, or if the owners have already ceased payments, is another matter. But to say it is crap with no merit is not accurate at all, it's an entirely valid possibility.
Exactly the opposite. With better results there will be more money coming in to increase the budget.mwillems wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 09:39Yeah but isn't that another reason why it is possible that extra sponsorship money will not go to the racing budget? Not saying there will be, or speculating at all. Just pointing out that it isn't a foregone conclusion as you suggested.McG wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 01:00Right at this moment the owners are pumping money into a planned wind tunnel.mwillems wrote: ↑04 Aug 2019, 18:10
It has been spoken openly as far as I remember, that the owners were supplementing the budget after the Honda split, from their own pockets and from sale of Assets, such as historic race cars. So it is entirely possible that any extra sponsorship may at first cover this amount. Now whether this was already resolved by the Latifi share purchase, or if the owners have already ceased payments, is another matter. But to say it is crap with no merit is not accurate at all, it's an entirely valid possibility.
Feel free to speculate about the future beyond that, but form has shown the owners aren't afraid to spend so I'll disagree with anyone who makes a wild guess.
Not really, the wind tunnel may not be a part of the racing budget. if you want to get into accounts, the wind tunnel expenditure may not even be aligned with the F1 Team, the CapEx will sit wherever it will save tax and add fiduciary value.McG wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 13:57Exactly the opposite. With better results there will be more money coming in to increase the budget.
It really was a silly notion from WrongDennis to begin with and doesn't deserve this amount of discussion.
I still can't believe that in Q2 qualifying in hungry we had 3 tenths on Haas, Alfa and 5 tenths on Renault, STR. Hungry's a short track to boot. Wonder how those floor upgrades are gonna fare in SPA?Jackles-UK wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 03:14If you’d offered me 5th and 9th before the weekend at possibly the track which is least suited to the car so far this season I’d have bitten your hand off! Great work from all involved, particularly Sainz who continues to prove that Red Bull were wrong to favour Gasly over him (despite the rumoured friction with Verstappen) with five top-6 finishes in his last seven races.
Spa & Monza might seem more suited to the car on paper but I expect the Ferrari & Mercedes engined cars (namely the Alfa and Racing Point) to be much closer to McLaren at those tracks due to their superior PU’s on what are, effectively, power circuits. Still, I agree with you that it has been a season surpassing all expectations thus far and the whole team deserves a huge amount of credit for turning it around in such a short space of time.
It seems the POU did go on this weekend too, which would have helped in the slow corners.diffuser wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 14:31I still can't believe that in Q2 qualifying in hungry we had 3 tenths on Haas, Alfa and 5 tenths on Renault, STR. Hungry's a short track to boot. Wonder how those floor upgrades are gonna fare in SPA?Jackles-UK wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 03:14If you’d offered me 5th and 9th before the weekend at possibly the track which is least suited to the car so far this season I’d have bitten your hand off! Great work from all involved, particularly Sainz who continues to prove that Red Bull were wrong to favour Gasly over him (despite the rumoured friction with Verstappen) with five top-6 finishes in his last seven races.
Spa & Monza might seem more suited to the car on paper but I expect the Ferrari & Mercedes engined cars (namely the Alfa and Racing Point) to be much closer to McLaren at those tracks due to their superior PU’s on what are, effectively, power circuits. Still, I agree with you that it has been a season surpassing all expectations thus far and the whole team deserves a huge amount of credit for turning it around in such a short space of time.
There is a difference between expenses and Capex (capital investments)... I agree with the rest telling you that the team has an approved budget and if they get more sponsors, that will simply reduce the amount that the investors pour into the team... The budget will remain the same (unless the sponsors provide more income than what is budgeted, which is unlikely).McG wrote:Right at this moment the owners are pumping money into a planned wind tunnel.mwillems wrote: ↑04 Aug 2019, 18:10It has been spoken openly as far as I remember, that the owners were supplementing the budget after the Honda split, from their own pockets and from sale of Assets, such as historic race cars. So it is entirely possible that any extra sponsorship may at first cover this amount. Now whether this was already resolved by the Latifi share purchase, or if the owners have already ceased payments, is another matter. But to say it is crap with no merit is not accurate at all, it's an entirely valid possibility.
Feel free to speculate about the future beyond that, but form has shown the owners aren't afraid to spend so I'll disagree with anyone who makes a wild guess.
I would be more concerned of even Renault... We all expected to do good at Montreal and it was Renault who shined in the “Power Track”.Jackles-UK wrote:If you’d offered me 5th and 9th before the weekend at possibly the track which is least suited to the car so far this season I’d have bitten your hand off! Great work from all involved, particularly Sainz who continues to prove that Red Bull were wrong to favour Gasly over him (despite the rumoured friction with Verstappen) with five top-6 finishes in his last seven races.
Spa & Monza might seem more suited to the car on paper but I expect the Ferrari & Mercedes engined cars (namely the Alfa and Racing Point) to be much closer to McLaren at those tracks due to their superior PU’s on what are, effectively, power circuits. Still, I agree with you that it has been a season surpassing all expectations thus far and the whole team deserves a huge amount of credit for turning it around in such a short space of time.
I’d still bet on Mclaren being ahead though. They have a really consistent car which is the exact opposite situation to Renault. In Canada where they hadn’t even understood the Barcelona spec car yet they would’ve been merely 2-3 tenths behind if not for all the issues. At the next race in France they dominated rest of the mid-fielders and that was with all the front end issues that’ve now seemingly been fixed.SmallSoldier wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 15:31I would be more concerned of even Renault... We all expected to do good at Montreal and it was Renault who shined in the “Power Track”.Jackles-UK wrote:If you’d offered me 5th and 9th before the weekend at possibly the track which is least suited to the car so far this season I’d have bitten your hand off! Great work from all involved, particularly Sainz who continues to prove that Red Bull were wrong to favour Gasly over him (despite the rumoured friction with Verstappen) with five top-6 finishes in his last seven races.
Spa & Monza might seem more suited to the car on paper but I expect the Ferrari & Mercedes engined cars (namely the Alfa and Racing Point) to be much closer to McLaren at those tracks due to their superior PU’s on what are, effectively, power circuits. Still, I agree with you that it has been a season surpassing all expectations thus far and the whole team deserves a huge amount of credit for turning it around in such a short space of time.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
That's a hell of a lot of "if". And that's part of my point.mwillems wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 14:18Not really, the wind tunnel may not be a part of the racing budget. if you want to get into accounts, the wind tunnel expenditure may not even be aligned with the F1 Team, the CapEx will sit wherever it will save tax and add fiduciary value.
So if the team need to pay for the tunnel via some of the sponsorship, that money might not make it to the teams budget in the first instance. Likewise, if the owners first want the team to stand on its own feet without and injection of money from the owners into the yearly budget, then any extra sponsorship may at first simply stop this injection and add nothing to the total of the budget.
So no, it isn't a silly notion, it is entirely possible that the budget may increase by nothing, or not too much more. Or of course it may increase a lot. Point is, it is possible and not unreasonable.
Anyway, I'll move on from this discussion.
I believe data shows that we should expect that... The problem is that during the season there have been so many performance changes based on track layout and track temperature that we have seeing a lot of surprises.M840TR wrote:I’d still bet on Mclaren being ahead though. They have a really consistent car which is the exact opposite situation to Renault. In Canada where they hadn’t even understood the Barcelona spec car yet they would’ve been merely 2-3 tenths behind if not for all the issues. At the next race in France they dominated rest of the mid-fielders and that was with all the front end issues that’ve now seemingly been fixed.SmallSoldier wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 15:31I would be more concerned of even Renault... We all expected to do good at Montreal and it was Renault who shined in the “Power Track”.Jackles-UK wrote: If you’d offered me 5th and 9th before the weekend at possibly the track which is least suited to the car so far this season I’d have bitten your hand off! Great work from all involved, particularly Sainz who continues to prove that Red Bull were wrong to favour Gasly over him (despite the rumoured friction with Verstappen) with five top-6 finishes in his last seven races.
Spa & Monza might seem more suited to the car on paper but I expect the Ferrari & Mercedes engined cars (namely the Alfa and Racing Point) to be much closer to McLaren at those tracks due to their superior PU’s on what are, effectively, power circuits. Still, I agree with you that it has been a season surpassing all expectations thus far and the whole team deserves a huge amount of credit for turning it around in such a short space of time.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk