BTW, your claim about more scientists than don´t believe in any human warming is one of the most absurd, biased and nosense statements I´ve read in decades Strad, sincerely
.
That is exactly what I would expect as one of the main tenets of mass psychology is to denigrate those on the other side.
What they do and have done is create an echo chamber of scientists that all agree to agree. IF you would read about Edward Benays you'd understand better but then I guess it's easier to listen to the medias BS than to research.
The national association of scholars writes: S. Fred Singer a leading skeptic of anthropogenic Global warming (AGW)
founder of the science and environmental policy project is an atmospheric physicist has challenged the IPCC findings and the Kyoto protocol since the 90s and produced a paper signed by over 100 scientists and meteorologists and an 800 page report that challenges their finding. He does believe there has been some warming but doesn't believe it's manmade . He says he feels his studies have proven that any manmade effects have been at best minimal and that the science is far from settled.
Patrick Michaels (spelling?) formerly a professor at the University of Virginia and currently the director of the Center for Study of Science at the Cato institute as well as a senior fellow in research and development at George Mason University explains that climate models have done a remarkably poor in replicating the evolution of global temperature during the past several decades and that high end climate horror stories emanating from these models are largely unsupported by observations, further they manage to ignore a spate of published science demonstrating that the sensitivity of temperature to carbon dioxide changes was substantially over estimated in those models. Richard S. Lindsen(spelling?) is a distinguished senior fellow at Cato's center for study of science , emeritus professor of meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and previously professor of Dynamic Meteorology at Harvard University, a member of the Academy of Sciences and a fellow of both the American Meteorological Society and the American Association for the Advancement of Science ,he received the Jewel G Charney award for highly significant research in the atmospheric sciences from the American Meteorological Society and the Distinguished Engineering Achievement Award from the Engineers Council in 2009, Lindsen's research in atmospheric dynamics has led to his conclution that the sensitivity of surface temperature to increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide is considerably below that necessary to generate disastrous climate change. Patrick Moore Greenpeace co-founder and Canadian ecologist testified before the United States Senate, that there is little correlation to support a direct causal relationship between CO2emissions and rising global temperatures. There is no scientific proof that rises on CVO2 are the dominant cause of any minor warming of the atmosphere over the past 100 years if there were such proof it would be written down for all to see. No actual proof as it is understood in science exists. He also criticized the U.N. panel on climate change for claiming it is extremely likely that human activity is the dominant cause for any global warming that might exist. He noted that extremely likely is not a scientific term. He warned that statistics presented by the IPCC are not the result of mathematical calculation or statistical analysis and may have been invented to support the IPCC's expert judgement.
Roy W. Spencer received his PHD in meteorology at the University of Wisconsin in 1981 before becoming a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in 2001. He was a senior scientist for climate studies at NASA's Marshalls Space Flight Center where he and Dr. John Christy received NASA's exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal
for their global temperature monitoring work with satellites. Dr. Spencer's work with NASA continues as the science team leader for advanced microwave scanning radiometer flying on NASA's Aqua satellite. During a presentation at the Heartland Institute's 9th international conference on climate change in Las Vegas Spencer explained that too many people think that all areas of science are created equal and that scientist objectively look for the answers but no there are two kind of scientists male and female other than that they're the same as everybody else and in many instances in the climate sciences more biased than your average person and went on to criticize the temperature data of NOAA because it has never taken into account the phenomenon of urban heat island effect...………"I could go on but I suppose these distinguished scientists accolades aren't good enough for you.
You'd rather listen to some talking head on the news being ventriloquized by the IPCC and be insulting to any what you call deniers. Which BTW is really insulting because it's a weak attempt to psychologically link us with those that are Holocaust deniers.
To achieve anything, you must be prepared to dabble on the boundary of disaster.”
Sir Stirling Moss