DRS flap looks to be oscillating on Max's car. Could this be on purpose?
Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
It was the same on Albon's car during FP1 I thinkYouhavebeendunn wrote: ↑04 Jul 2020, 13:04DRS flap looks to be oscillating on Max's car. Could this be on purpose?
Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
We should have a level playing field, everybody a Mercedes enginePyrone89 wrote: ↑06 Jul 2020, 16:17Look at this:
it is both engine and chassis that Red Bull is getting murdered by Mercedes. And that while from now on engines are basically frozen until 2026 with only small changes allowed (none in 2020 apart from 1 K and control electronics) and chassis development is also severly limited until the end of 2021.
You mean oversteer.loekf2 wrote: ↑06 Jul 2020, 16:33We should have a level playing field, everybody a Mercedes enginePyrone89 wrote: ↑06 Jul 2020, 16:17Look at this:
it is both engine and chassis that Red Bull is getting murdered by Mercedes. And that while from now on engines are basically frozen until 2026 with only small changes allowed (none in 2020 apart from 1 K and control electronics) and chassis development is also severly limited until the end of 2021.
(or take the weakest, a Ferrari engine)
Seriously, looking at the past 1-2 years, I'm wondering why the rear of the Red Bull cars are always terribly unstable. For RB16 it looked like they made lot of changes to the rear, incl. suspension. Still, they have understeer (?) issues. Think Verstappen also complained on Dutch TV about it ("the balance of the car").
I wonder how much of that is influenced by tyre temps? it seems to be where getting the initial power down is a large component of it, which can be influenced by tyre temp.Pyrone89 wrote: ↑06 Jul 2020, 16:17Look at this:
it is both engine and chassis that Red Bull is getting murdered by Mercedes. And that while from now on engines are basically frozen until 2026 with only small changes allowed (none in 2020 apart from 1 K and control electronics) and chassis development is also severly limited until the end of 2021.
2019 front wing rules affected stability of high rake cars like the Red Bull, more than low rake cars like Mercedes.
This reminds of the technical deputy at Redbull, who was responsible for the disastrous RB14, so when Newey took a break to work on Valkerie. This guy, think it is Pierre Waché, is a thermodynamics guy by nature and was expressing a strong wish to put more effort into "nurturing" the tyres.Big Tea wrote: ↑06 Jul 2020, 16:48I wonder how much of that is influenced by tyre temps? it seems to be where getting the initial power down is a large component of it, which can be influenced by tyre temp.Pyrone89 wrote: ↑06 Jul 2020, 16:17Look at this:
it is both engine and chassis that Red Bull is getting murdered by Mercedes. And that while from now on engines are basically frozen until 2026 with only small changes allowed (none in 2020 apart from 1 K and control electronics) and chassis development is also severly limited until the end of 2021.
Just gumbeating here mind
Seeing how Newey is admant on staying with high rake you can forget about ever getting a car that has a wide set-up window. When the car is dialed in it is a monster, if not it is a handfull. They could have at least used Alpha Tauri as a test bed for a Mercedes style low rake car.McMika98 wrote: ↑06 Jul 2020, 22:05The car is not consistent according to drivers, understeer with medium tyres and then on fresh soft massive oversteer. Probably why the one lap pace is not quite there as they can't judge the balance come hammer time.
The race pace delta to merc is about half a second which is quite a lot to claw back in a week.