Ferrari are reducing downforce to gain top sped. This ”new” FW have we seen many times before.
This is Ferraris new direction, lower downforce, just becouse koncept of SF1000 is not working at all.
Ferrari are reducing downforce to gain top sped. This ”new” FW have we seen many times before.
Afaik the top teams run a separate gearbox inside a carbon casing. The load transfers through the casing which also got the suspension pickup point on it. You can modify the casing without penalty, just the gearbox itself is sealed. So yes, Ferrari could make changes to the casing without violating any rules.
So last year they claimed missing DF to be their issue and now (with the "new" engine) they claim they got doo much DF/drag. That makes the Ferrari engineering department look stupid and dumb, i guess?
Seems that they are experiencing correlation issues. Simulations showed better car performance than in real world..Tzk wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 11:30So last year they claimed missing DF to be their issue and now (with the "new" engine) they claim they got doo much DF/drag. That makes the Ferrari engineering department look stupid and dumb, i guess?
MtthsMlw wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 12:29https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EcjtW_HXoAA ... name=large
via @Gianludale27
What do you mean?CRazyLemon wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 13:32Seems Ferrari will have quite a cfd advantage going into 2022 at this rate.
Low in constructors championship. Hence accordingly to the new "equality" rules lower u are, more cfd time u got on ur hand extra.LM10 wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 17:02What do you mean?CRazyLemon wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 13:32Seems Ferrari will have quite a cfd advantage going into 2022 at this rate.
James Allison mentioned this in an interview. Your 2022 CFD hours are determined by the team standings in 2020.aleks_ader wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 17:14Low in constructors championship. Hence accordingly to the new "equality" rules lower u are, more cfd time u got on ur hand extra.LM10 wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 17:02What do you mean?CRazyLemon wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 13:32Seems Ferrari will have quite a cfd advantage going into 2022 at this rate.
So test everything this yearManfer wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 18:39James Allison mentioned this in an interview. Your 2022 CFD hours are determined by the team standings in 2020.aleks_ader wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 17:14Low in constructors championship. Hence accordingly to the new "equality" rules lower u are, more cfd time u got on ur hand extra.
https://the-race.com/formula-1/laggy-sl ... n-allison/
Working on the 2022 car is not allowed this season, if that’s what you mean.Big Tea wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 20:09So test everything this yearManfer wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 18:39James Allison mentioned this in an interview. Your 2022 CFD hours are determined by the team standings in 2020.aleks_ader wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 17:14
Low in constructors championship. Hence accordingly to the new "equality" rules lower u are, more cfd time u got on ur hand extra.
https://the-race.com/formula-1/laggy-sl ... n-allison/
No, not specifically. I meant try 50/50 options and extra collaboration of wind tunnel and CFD software sort of thing.LM10 wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 20:14Working on the 2022 car is not allowed this season, if that’s what you mean.Big Tea wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 20:09So test everything this yearManfer wrote: ↑10 Jul 2020, 18:39
James Allison mentioned this in an interview. Your 2022 CFD hours are determined by the team standings in 2020.
https://the-race.com/formula-1/laggy-sl ... n-allison/