Ferrari SF1000

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Fer.Fan
Fer.Fan
0
Joined: 02 Mar 2015, 21:31

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

Ferrari are reducing downforce to gain top sped. This ”new” FW have we seen many times before.

This is Ferraris new direction, lower downforce, just becouse koncept of SF1000 is not working at all.

Tzk
Tzk
34
Joined: 28 Jul 2018, 12:49

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

Xwang wrote:
09 Jul 2020, 19:48
The gearbox now is omologated and it is not clear if it is the newer (more rigid) one.
Does anyone have news about it?
Afaik the top teams run a separate gearbox inside a carbon casing. The load transfers through the casing which also got the suspension pickup point on it. You can modify the casing without penalty, just the gearbox itself is sealed. So yes, Ferrari could make changes to the casing without violating any rules.
Fer.Fan wrote:
10 Jul 2020, 11:01
Ferrari are reducing downforce to gain top sped. This ”new” FW have we seen many times before.
So last year they claimed missing DF to be their issue and now (with the "new" engine) they claim they got doo much DF/drag. That makes the Ferrari engineering department look stupid and dumb, i guess?

User avatar
MtthsMlw
1036
Joined: 12 Jul 2017, 18:38
Location: Germany

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

Image
via @Gianludale27

Sevach
Sevach
1081
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 17:00

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

Ferrari sporting humongous hot air exits in FP1.

Helping the engine breathe easier? Internal airflow?

CRazyLemon
CRazyLemon
4
Joined: 29 Mar 2012, 14:22

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

Seems Ferrari will have quite a cfd advantage going into 2022 at this rate.

User avatar
F1NAC
170
Joined: 31 Mar 2013, 22:35

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

Tzk wrote:
10 Jul 2020, 11:30
So last year they claimed missing DF to be their issue and now (with the "new" engine) they claim they got doo much DF/drag. That makes the Ferrari engineering department look stupid and dumb, i guess?
Seems that they are experiencing correlation issues. Simulations showed better car performance than in real world..

Tzk
Tzk
34
Joined: 28 Jul 2018, 12:49

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

I also thought about correlation issues. But that was back in 2018 or 19 and this never got confirmed. But that'd be a good reason for their issues, yes.

User avatar
Morteza
2308
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 18:23
Location: Bushehr, Iran

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

MtthsMlw wrote:
10 Jul 2020, 12:29
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EcjtW_HXoAA ... name=large
via @Gianludale27
Image
Via @AlbertFabrega
"A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool."~William Shakespeare

LM10
LM10
121
Joined: 07 Mar 2018, 00:07

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

CRazyLemon wrote:
10 Jul 2020, 13:32
Seems Ferrari will have quite a cfd advantage going into 2022 at this rate.
What do you mean?

User avatar
aleks_ader
90
Joined: 28 Jul 2011, 08:40

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

LM10 wrote:
10 Jul 2020, 17:02
CRazyLemon wrote:
10 Jul 2020, 13:32
Seems Ferrari will have quite a cfd advantage going into 2022 at this rate.
What do you mean?
Low in constructors championship. Hence accordingly to the new "equality" rules lower u are, more cfd time u got on ur hand extra.
"And if you no longer go for a gap that exists, you're no longer a racing driver..." Ayrton Senna

Manfer
Manfer
18
Joined: 14 Feb 2015, 06:45

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

aleks_ader wrote:
10 Jul 2020, 17:14
LM10 wrote:
10 Jul 2020, 17:02
CRazyLemon wrote:
10 Jul 2020, 13:32
Seems Ferrari will have quite a cfd advantage going into 2022 at this rate.
What do you mean?
Low in constructors championship. Hence accordingly to the new "equality" rules lower u are, more cfd time u got on ur hand extra.
James Allison mentioned this in an interview. Your 2022 CFD hours are determined by the team standings in 2020.

https://the-race.com/formula-1/laggy-sl ... n-allison/

User avatar
MtthsMlw
1036
Joined: 12 Jul 2017, 18:38
Location: Germany

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

New diffuser (outer section) tested today.
Image
via @Gianludale27

User avatar
Big Tea
99
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 20:57

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

Manfer wrote:
10 Jul 2020, 18:39
aleks_ader wrote:
10 Jul 2020, 17:14
LM10 wrote:
10 Jul 2020, 17:02


What do you mean?
Low in constructors championship. Hence accordingly to the new "equality" rules lower u are, more cfd time u got on ur hand extra.
James Allison mentioned this in an interview. Your 2022 CFD hours are determined by the team standings in 2020.

https://the-race.com/formula-1/laggy-sl ... n-allison/
So test everything this year :D
When arguing with a fool, be sure the other person is not doing the same thing.

LM10
LM10
121
Joined: 07 Mar 2018, 00:07

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

Big Tea wrote:
10 Jul 2020, 20:09
Manfer wrote:
10 Jul 2020, 18:39
aleks_ader wrote:
10 Jul 2020, 17:14


Low in constructors championship. Hence accordingly to the new "equality" rules lower u are, more cfd time u got on ur hand extra.
James Allison mentioned this in an interview. Your 2022 CFD hours are determined by the team standings in 2020.

https://the-race.com/formula-1/laggy-sl ... n-allison/
So test everything this year :D
Working on the 2022 car is not allowed this season, if that’s what you mean.

User avatar
Big Tea
99
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 20:57

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

LM10 wrote:
10 Jul 2020, 20:14
Big Tea wrote:
10 Jul 2020, 20:09
Manfer wrote:
10 Jul 2020, 18:39


James Allison mentioned this in an interview. Your 2022 CFD hours are determined by the team standings in 2020.

https://the-race.com/formula-1/laggy-sl ... n-allison/
So test everything this year :D
Working on the 2022 car is not allowed this season, if that’s what you mean.
No, not specifically. I meant try 50/50 options and extra collaboration of wind tunnel and CFD software sort of thing.
Anything that may side track the main event in 22
When arguing with a fool, be sure the other person is not doing the same thing.