gandharva wrote: ↑01 Aug 2020, 21:39
It's really funny how everyone thinks it's just the aero to blame. Yes that car has some balance issues but the engine inferiority is much, much worse.
They did a huge gamble in voting against oil and fuel trickery, because they thought it would also affect Merc. But it only --- Ferrari and to a lesser extend Honda and also Renault, because everyone thought that all the engine guys are using the same tricks. Now we see how wrong they have been. Merc had a lead start into 2014 and their lead is even bigger now. Without a significant rule change nothing will change. Nothing! It does not matter at all if RBR is behind a second or "just" 0.5. With this regulations they will always be behind, because there is no playroom left in aero regulations these days to make up such a huge difference in power and FIA seems to have no intend to change this.
I don't think the Honda is inferior, its the utter dominant Mercedes power (especially Q mode) that makes the difference. With that power they can afford to run a low rake design, add hundreds of serrations to fine tune the aero, create a stable handling car.
I still wonder why for about 4 years in a row the Merc car is full of serrations, with much more detail than the RB. Is this down to aero design philosophy, budget or lack of power? May be a combination.
Going on like this with one team winning the WCC and WDC for years in a row is bad for F1. Or are we heading to a spec serie with one engine supplier and three or four chassis builders? Then it will Indycar Europe. I dont know, may be its better because the influence of the driver is larger and thus more spectacle.
As for Max, to further grow he would benefit from a experienced driver, now he himself is his benchmark. May be they need a driver who can give additional valuable feedback on the car.
Although I like Albon he is at the same struggle as Gasly.