And the Mach 6 at the end!!!

SecondConceptual wrote:Hydrogen is sad... Anti-matter batteries 4 teh win!
I saw it on the Discovery Channel a while back...MattF1 wrote:What's an antimatter battery?
And the utter annihilation of the known universe?It is the mass production that becomes the problem...
Amateurs... You did it too big!!!!jddh1 wrote:I'm working on a black hole battery in my garage.![]()
![]()
The only problem is that I can't seem to make it stop sucking. I guess it will end up being a battery for vacuum cleaners only.
Definately uses alot of energy to make. I believe that the show that I saw used a collider that had its own nuclear plant...Miguel wrote:Amateurs... You did it too big!!!!jddh1 wrote:I'm working on a black hole battery in my garage.![]()
![]()
The only problem is that I can't seem to make it stop sucking. I guess it will end up being a battery for vacuum cleaners only.
As every kid in 5º year knows, black holes evaporate at a speed inversely proportional to their mass, so a smaller black hole should work for a decent vacuum cleaner. Watch out Hawking radiation, though.
In a (somewhat) more serious note, I find it hard to imagine that someone would create antimatter batteries. Sounds cool and all, and very mass-efficient (E=mc² after all), but it doesn't seem productive to me. I mean, you need such a huge amount of energy to create antimatter today. But for the brighter minds, please, go ahead!
Doh'! I knew something wasn't feeling right.Miguel wrote:Amateurs... You did it too big!!!!
HA!Conceptual wrote:As long as CERN doesnt concentrate on event horizons for time travel attempts, maybe they can become the worlds leader in anti-matter battery production!