it's not funny
These kind of things have too many sides human can not calculate.Big Tea wrote: ↑19 Sep 2020, 23:27You know, My immediate thought was Max is going nowhere, it's Merc or Red Bull, but then I had one of those 'what if' moments.
As it stands, Max is on 110 points, 47 ahead of his team mate, who is just 2 points in front of Stroll at RP.
(He could easily have 20 odd more had things not gone wrong)
Where would Max be if he was at RP, and what would Red Bull have had Max not been the No1 driver?
More to the point, where would he be if RP had already morphed into AM and had the backing and finances to develop more quickly, and attract the required people? Ahead of Red Bull without Max?
Maybe my initial thought of 'there is no where but RedBull' is not so sharp after all?
What you think?
Verstappen has 3 dnf and in all other races he was at podium and one of them top of podium which is impossible for RP. It is not a clever thing to say that Albon shows redbull car's level and perez and stroll shows RP car's level lower then it's real level.
That is not going to happen. As long as Hamilton is at Merc, neither Max, nor Leclerc or anyone who wants to be team leader or disrupt the way things are is going to be brought in.Wass85 wrote: ↑20 Sep 2020, 11:46If I were Max I'd be doing my utmost to join Merc alongside Hamilton, the only way to get a foothold there is to oust him.
Surely Mercedes will still be favourites when the new regulations come in. If that's not possible then he just as to pray that Red Bull can fight for the titles at some point.
Yep highly unlikely but that wouldn't stop me from asking if I were him.Big Tea wrote: ↑20 Sep 2020, 12:13That is not going to happen. As long as Hamilton is at Merc, neither Max, nor Leclerc or anyone who wants to be team leader or disrupt the way things are is going to be brought in.Wass85 wrote: ↑20 Sep 2020, 11:46If I were Max I'd be doing my utmost to join Merc alongside Hamilton, the only way to get a foothold there is to oust him.
Surely Mercedes will still be favourites when the new regulations come in. If that's not possible then he just as to pray that Red Bull can fight for the titles at some point.
As the saying goes, if it is not broken, don't fix it.
As the major teams are preparing for more or less level brother/sister team (Merc/AM, RB/AT) and budget cap works as intended, performance differences should be smaller after 2022/2023. As your initial 2022 car can be developed with unlimited funds, performance differences will be obtained by the design team with roughly the highest combination of engineering skill and funds. That is not Ferrari and probably not Renault. That leaves Merc/AM, RB/AT and McLaren. Personel wise I think we should not underestimate McL because of Seidl and Key. It is a bit of a crystal ball estimation but Merc/AM is probably ahead to RB/AT because engine but also funds (and may be also personnel).Big Tea wrote: ↑19 Sep 2020, 23:27
More to the point, where would he be if RP had already morphed into AM and had the backing and finances to develop more quickly, and attract the required people? Ahead of Red Bull without Max?
Maybe my initial thought of 'there is no where but RedBull' is not so sharp after all?
What you think?
I don't buy that .2 a lap a season. I think it's alot less than that and everything hings on the chassis being to apply that extra power. Think it's closer to .05. but the I'm just pulling numbers out of my a$$.godlameroso wrote: ↑19 Sep 2020, 21:35They can make all the changes they want for the engine next year, what they can't do is develop in season. So all the steps they would have introduced this year will have no track validation, only dyno validation. Fuel also can be changed, all things can be changed for next season so expect a half second step on the engine side alone. Where manufacturers typically gain ~.2 over the season then again .2 over the winter, instead the developments will be consolidated. One can only hope Mercedes doesn't have a similar step over the winter as they've had this year.
The engine is less than 3 tenths down as is, the rest of the gap comes from the chassis. Next year the chassis will need to compensate for the aero parts it is losing after this year. I'm guessing we return to 2019 levels of performance next year, hopefully not similar gaps.
I don't buy that .2 a lap a season. I think it's alot less than that and everything hings on the chassis being able to apply that extra power. Think it's closer to .05 but I'm just pulling the numbers out of my a$$.godlameroso wrote: ↑19 Sep 2020, 21:35They can make all the changes they want for the engine next year, what they can't do is develop in season. So all the steps they would have introduced this year will have no track validation, only dyno validation. Fuel also can be changed, all things can be changed for next season so expect a half second step on the engine side alone. Where manufacturers typically gain ~.2 over the season then again .2 over the winter, instead the developments will be consolidated. One can only hope Mercedes doesn't have a similar step over the winter as they've had this year.
The engine is less than 3 tenths down as is, the rest of the gap comes from the chassis. Next year the chassis will need to compensate for the aero parts it is losing after this year. I'm guessing we return to 2019 levels of performance next year, hopefully not similar gaps.
If I was Max, I'd stay at RBR till end of 2022. Merc don't need him and alot of rumors about where they'll be in 2022. By the middle of 2022 you'll know who's gotten the new regs right. RBR have probably got a better chance than most at getting them right. You just don't know these days. Alot of fresh money in F1 [RP & Williams] now and some of them will probably start moving a majority of their resources to 2022 soon.Big Tea wrote: ↑20 Sep 2020, 12:13That is not going to happen. As long as Hamilton is at Merc, neither Max, nor Leclerc or anyone who wants to be team leader or disrupt the way things are is going to be brought in.Wass85 wrote: ↑20 Sep 2020, 11:46If I were Max I'd be doing my utmost to join Merc alongside Hamilton, the only way to get a foothold there is to oust him.
Surely Mercedes will still be favourites when the new regulations come in. If that's not possible then he just as to pray that Red Bull can fight for the titles at some point.
As the saying goes, if it is not broken, don't fix it.
They're going to lose downforce next year. Likely be at 2019 levels which was lower than it was in 2018. But they will have 2019 Ferrari levels of power.diffuser wrote: ↑20 Sep 2020, 14:49I don't buy that .2 a lap a season. I think it's alot less than that and everything hings on the chassis being to apply that extra power. Think it's closer to .05. but the I'm just pulling numbers out of my a$$.godlameroso wrote: ↑19 Sep 2020, 21:35They can make all the changes they want for the engine next year, what they can't do is develop in season. So all the steps they would have introduced this year will have no track validation, only dyno validation. Fuel also can be changed, all things can be changed for next season so expect a half second step on the engine side alone. Where manufacturers typically gain ~.2 over the season then again .2 over the winter, instead the developments will be consolidated. One can only hope Mercedes doesn't have a similar step over the winter as they've had this year.
The engine is less than 3 tenths down as is, the rest of the gap comes from the chassis. Next year the chassis will need to compensate for the aero parts it is losing after this year. I'm guessing we return to 2019 levels of performance next year, hopefully not similar gaps.
If one adds more DF every year that also equates into being able to use more of the existing HP. Also more DF helps at lower speeds where it's easier to make uptime. More HP is gonna have demising returns a higher speeds.