above the left side of the rear wing and below the right. some of the others photos have this as well.
![Image](https://scontent-ort2-2.cdninstagram.com/v/t51.2885-15/sh0.08/e35/s640x640/144873883_912850895920304_2307635934001820826_n.jpg?_nc_ht=scontent-ort2-2.cdninstagram.com&_nc_cat=108&_nc_ohc=8WhauLDimtAAX8FiFAz&tp=1&oh=55650250d9aea3bb71932e132db5e365&oe=6040DAA1)
According to Marko, the reason why the four competing teams mentioned hesitated with their yes vote at the last engine summit was due to legal formulations that have now been adjusted.
Important: This means that wobbly candidate Mercedes with its three customer teams Aston Martin, McLaren and Williams would no longer have the opportunity to block the rule change, which is so important for Red Bull. The FIA itself, promoter Liberty and the race track promoters have already sent positive signals in advance.
100% disagree. they're obvious photoshops by somebody with very limited talent in that area.
@ Dans79,
Interesting development.Snorked wrote: ↑01 Feb 2021, 21:50Engine freeze vote on the 21st https://f1-insider.com/en/formula1/red- ... ssion=true
According to Marko, the reason why the four competing teams mentioned hesitated with their yes vote at the last engine summit was due to legal formulations that have now been adjusted.
Important: This means that wobbly candidate Mercedes with its three customer teams Aston Martin, McLaren and Williams would no longer have the opportunity to block the rule change, which is so important for Red Bull. The FIA itself, promoter Liberty and the race track promoters have already sent positive signals in advance.
I see why you think so. But then it can't be "simple" photoshop, cause shadows of rear wing look correct (angle and sizes), both on the back of chassis and on the ground.Wouter wrote: ↑02 Feb 2021, 09:43On closer inspection, I think the rear wing has been photoshopped. She probably did this because it is too difficult for her to make that part, because her hobby is painting. I just really love that she came up with the idea to transform a ride-on car that has been sold all over the world for more than 40 years into an RB16. Even if it had been a car from another team.
why, because you can't distinguish that people simply discuss an obvious photoshop blur, leading to the theory that perhaps more could be 'fake', in a world were more and more is fake, on a forum where anything can and should be discussed?
surprised that the F1 store still mentions RedBull as 'Aston Martin RedBull racing'Sieper wrote: ↑02 Feb 2021, 17:26looks great!
Also, please remove if inappropriate, see here the 2021 clothing collection (first items), it sports a similar new light blue.
https://f1store.formula1.com/en/t-9885+ ... ource=MKTG