Yep, this was one of the things that peaked my interest even before testing began. If memory serves they have always done the filming before testing. To be fair though, I thought it was because they were trying to get as much design/testing/sim time as possible.
Haha excellent reference. You can give Buxton a run for his money, but on the Trek side of the equation.
Reasons behind it: better weather and cost efficiency (which is key this year). The team's already in Bahrain, might as well test there.e30ernest wrote: ↑16 Mar 2021, 06:00I think that is what a lot of members here think. Delaying the filming day was a planned move by Mercedes so there has to be a reason behind it. I am guessing they were testing correlation and pushing the car to the extremes of its envelope (hence the instability we are seeing) in preparation for something they will be using during filming/first race.
Of course it conjecture, only Merc know what’s going on, however it certainly fits a past patternmkay wrote: ↑16 Mar 2021, 11:20Reasons behind it: better weather and cost efficiency (which is key this year). The team's already in Bahrain, might as well test there.e30ernest wrote: ↑16 Mar 2021, 06:00I think that is what a lot of members here think. Delaying the filming day was a planned move by Mercedes so there has to be a reason behind it. I am guessing they were testing correlation and pushing the car to the extremes of its envelope (hence the instability we are seeing) in preparation for something they will be using during filming/first race.
Anything else is pure conjecture, aka I'll believe it when I see it.
I would agree with you had it not for Merc not doing what other teams that have done their filming in Bahrain did; that is, film just before the test began. They could have done that and gotten all the benefits you mentioned above, while also getting the added benefit of getting that shakedown run in. That they didn't do it is either an oversight (unlikely) or something they deliberately planned.mkay wrote: ↑16 Mar 2021, 11:20Reasons behind it: better weather and cost efficiency (which is key this year). The team's already in Bahrain, might as well test there.e30ernest wrote: ↑16 Mar 2021, 06:00I think that is what a lot of members here think. Delaying the filming day was a planned move by Mercedes so there has to be a reason behind it. I am guessing they were testing correlation and pushing the car to the extremes of its envelope (hence the instability we are seeing) in preparation for something they will be using during filming/first race.
Anything else is pure conjecture, aka I'll believe it when I see it.
Another aero update which solves the theoretic problems on the way? I guess its the case, again.e30ernest wrote: ↑16 Mar 2021, 06:00I think that is what a lot of members here think. Delaying the filming day was a planned move by Mercedes so there has to be a reason behind it. I am guessing they were testing correlation and pushing the car to the extremes of its envelope (hence the instability we are seeing) in preparation for something they will be using during filming/first race.
Everything I'm hearing points to this being a legit filming day rather than a shakedown for anything substantial.
Tracking vehicles on track filming. Slow laps with Merc Safety Car for promos. Multiple cameras trackside and in pitlane.
Also, I understand they're running the SakhirGP layout. They'll get more laps and content from fewer cameras as a result. Also means removing most of the med/high speed direction changes that might have given an indication on resolving issues had new parts been run.
In short then, it's not all part of some devious masterplan as a few rival teams had feared.
It's a genuine filming day for content capture.
The troublesome test run has discovered the "hair in the soup," as Toto put it. The team has a week to fix it.
Game on.
Nice video, but clearly made for non tech savvy fans. There's literally no new information, apart from migration of survival cell. Especially underwhelming because usually there's always some juicy bits in Allison's videos, but this is one just bland PR exercise.zibby43 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2021, 23:27Posted in the comment section of this video, which dropped today:El Scorchio wrote: ↑15 Mar 2021, 23:23Was this posted after the test? The tokens thing is very intriguing. So many hints about it being obvious, but definitely nothing obvious on the car in the last few days.zibby43 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2021, 22:33Courtesy of F1T member "LightningLewis"
I'm guessing the W12 we saw in Bahrain is not the W12 we will see in Bahrain.
https://i.ibb.co/Lzd9SfF/Screenshot-202 ... u-Tube.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFQeGKG8KoQ
I do not agree, the comment on the used parts shades a lot of light on the spend tokens. As DAS was mounted to the tub, I expected maybe a structural change there, but as they use the old tub this is definitely not the case. Also the nose and gearbox is the same. So the spend tokens have to be around the gearbox casing and rear axle, which emphasises the point that most probably something was missing there.Juzh wrote: ↑16 Mar 2021, 13:03Nice video, but clearly made for non tech savvy fans. There's literally no new information, apart from migration of survival cell. Especially underwhelming because usually there's always some juicy bits in Allison's videos, but this is one just bland PR exercise.zibby43 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2021, 23:27Posted in the comment section of this video, which dropped today:El Scorchio wrote: ↑15 Mar 2021, 23:23
Was this posted after the test? The tokens thing is very intriguing. So many hints about it being obvious, but definitely nothing obvious on the car in the last few days.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFQeGKG8KoQ
Yes and No, it makes sense as they are there, but usually you would do it in the week leading up to the test, on a wednesday or thursday. To find any small issues ect with just running the car. To do it after really does look like a tactical move for 1 reason or another.
Tactical move in that it allows Merc to probably save some money in a year where teams have to adhere to a budget cap.NathanOlder wrote: ↑16 Mar 2021, 14:05Yes and No, it makes sense as they are there, but usually you would do it in the week leading up to the test, on a wednesday or thursday. To find any small issues ect with just running the car. To do it after really does look like a tactical move for 1 reason or another.
SO why do the 'filming' day after testing and not before ? The cost would be the same, so not money. It even makes more sense to do it before, to find any hidden gremlins that would usually cost you precious testing time. Just like what happened on Friday. So what are your thoughts as to why do it after testing and not before ?mkay wrote: ↑16 Mar 2021, 15:10Tactical move in that it allows Merc to probably save some money in a year where teams have to adhere to a budget cap.NathanOlder wrote: ↑16 Mar 2021, 14:05Yes and No, it makes sense as they are there, but usually you would do it in the week leading up to the test, on a wednesday or thursday. To find any small issues ect with just running the car. To do it after really does look like a tactical move for 1 reason or another.
We will see more and more cost-saving moves like this going forward. Days of unfettered extravagance are behind us now.