It’s the default easy get out to just claim after the session that there’s some huge gap in car performance.NathanOlder wrote: ↑08 May 2021, 16:19So being 0.036 behind means they are not on the same level ?pantherxxx wrote: ↑08 May 2021, 16:17Legendary Max. Congrats to Verstappen. It's sad that Red Bull is still not on the level of Merc, hopefully they can improve in the season.
Yes. And what's wrong? I made an analysis posted a conclusion. It was correct. Why can't you be happy for me?Juzh wrote: ↑08 May 2021, 16:25At the time you wrote that it was just the end of first Q3 runs, dont be coy. Some drivers did improve on seconds runs.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑08 May 2021, 16:23Slower form first Q3 run to second Q3 run obviously.
How did I know? Look for fine details.
Just listen to yourself. Literally moments after Hamilton improved 4 tenths from Q2 to Q3 you declared track is getting slower. That's gotta be the worst deductive analysis I've ever come across. And no it was far from correct, keep dreaming.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑08 May 2021, 16:29Yes. And what's wrong? I made an analysis posted a conclusion. It was correct. Why can't you be happy for me?Juzh wrote: ↑08 May 2021, 16:25At the time you wrote that it was just the end of first Q3 runs, dont be coy. Some drivers did improve on seconds runs.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑08 May 2021, 16:23
Slower form first Q3 run to second Q3 run obviously.
How did I know? Look for fine details.
That’s dope.
It did in Q3, looking at the data channel, track temp dropped and wind did pick up.
If anything conditions were better in Q3. Track temp went up from 43.7 degrees to 44.1 degrees, which is negligible difference, and wind was down from 2.9 kmh to 0.7 kmh. That's from Verstappen's Q2 lap 1:16.922 to his first Q3 Lap 1:16.777. Track conditions were a non-issue.
Either looking for a tow, or didn't want to run the risk of getting trapped behind slower cars.