Owen.C93 wrote: ↑19 May 2021, 19:41
diffuser wrote: ↑19 May 2021, 08:03
Owen.C93 wrote: ↑19 May 2021, 07:17
Because the wing and camera are fixed relative to each other via the body?
The camera is in that black horizontal tube about 4"(10 CMs) near the roll hoop. The rake fulcrum is the front wheels. The rear wing squat will travel much more the camera. Even so, the rear wing drop would still be apparent if they both dropped together.
If the grid lines were painted on a wall fixed the the ground behind the car then I agree. But the grid and the camera are essentially rigidly fixed together, which is why it can be used to measure the relative flex.
My argument, if I choose to accept it , would be...
From the side of the car, the distance between the floor and the ground where the camera is vs the distance from the floor to ground at rear wing, Must be half(rake).
Therefore where is that extra travel?
Queue in mission impossible theme music!