I would consider it unlikely but I have witnessed weirder things happening in F1.
From my point of view, if Horner steps down or is kicked out of RedBull, he won't be involved with F1 anymore.
I would consider it unlikely but I have witnessed weirder things happening in F1.
The W15 is a completely new car and the team was very late in the game to copy the RB18/9 aero concept. So it should be expected the team will need time to extract the W15 potential.Emag wrote: ↑03 Mar 2024, 01:33Mercedes has suffered some bleeding when it comes to human resources lately and its tough to pin it all on Toto. This team has been in somewhat of a crisis since 2021.Vanja #66 wrote: ↑03 Mar 2024, 01:27He should still start by resigning and allowing a fresh face with new energy and better attitude to take over. That's just how these things go in sports, an era passed and it's time to move on. Arguably, Toto is simply too proud and stubborn to accept he's part of the problem for a while now.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑03 Mar 2024, 01:04He wants to make the team as attractive as possible for new drivers and sponsors before Hamilton leaves.
Assuming Toto does step down, I don't think he would be doing the team any favours. I don't see a clear better candidate to take over the TP role at Mercedes.
If he resigns today, the team will probably fall into turmoil. At least short term, it wouldn't have a positive effect.
If the car is draggier, they would have to consume more fuel to cover the same distance. I can't give exact numbers, it's too complicated, and probably off topic. Also, lift and coast is expected in the race. I doubt the drivers suffered any "confidence loss". If anything they had a boost because the car had more downforce due to the limited cooling that it was running.stonehenge wrote: ↑03 Mar 2024, 05:30That's true, but insufficient cooling would have detrimental effects on a whole bunch of things impacting performance. Lower engine performance, more lift and coast, therefore a lower fuel burn and more weight on the car, detrimental to drivers' confidence and ability to extract performance, etc. I don't find it hard to believe that it cost them a significant amount of time, perhaps even 5-6 tenths like Toto said. Which is why it is INSANE that they would make such a mistake, especially at a track that they just did 3 days of testing on. Teams generally have a good handling on how much cooling they will need. The only exception is Mexico, but that's because the air is so much thinner that everyone is riding on the edge.AR3-GP wrote: ↑03 Mar 2024, 04:22Like Hungarian GP '23, they sacrificed cooling for performance and got caught out.Venturiation wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 19:14Why is the PU overheating now that their cooling isn't compromised by zeropods?
Some care needs to be taken with regards to the comments about the performance loss due to the issue since it's really not a 1:1 correlation.
Increasing the cooling openings on the car makes it draggier and compromises some downforce due to flow being "consumed" by the internal flows, rather than being sent down the side of the car. So you can't just add back the engine performance and say that's where you "would have been".
Its less lying and more towards delusion. Our simulations show this...our cooling stopped us from doing that.
If you’re talking about low to medium levels of management then sure, but this seemed more significant. Anyhow, no one except Mercedes knows what really is the case, my main point was that even if they’re right, it doesn’t make them look good at all!AR3-GP wrote: ↑03 Mar 2024, 06:00If the car is draggier, they would have to consume more fuel to cover the same distance. I can't give exact numbers, it's too complicated, and probably off topic. Also, lift and coast is expected in the race. I doubt the drivers suffered any "confidence loss". If anything they had a boost because the car had more downforce due to the limited cooling that it was running.stonehenge wrote: ↑03 Mar 2024, 05:30That's true, but insufficient cooling would have detrimental effects on a whole bunch of things impacting performance. Lower engine performance, more lift and coast, therefore a lower fuel burn and more weight on the car, detrimental to drivers' confidence and ability to extract performance, etc. I don't find it hard to believe that it cost them a significant amount of time, perhaps even 5-6 tenths like Toto said. Which is why it is INSANE that they would make such a mistake, especially at a track that they just did 3 days of testing on. Teams generally have a good handling on how much cooling they will need. The only exception is Mexico, but that's because the air is so much thinner that everyone is riding on the edge.AR3-GP wrote: ↑03 Mar 2024, 04:22
Like Hungarian GP '23, they sacrificed cooling for performance and got caught out.
Some care needs to be taken with regards to the comments about the performance loss due to the issue since it's really not a 1:1 correlation.
Increasing the cooling openings on the car makes it draggier and compromises some downforce due to flow being "consumed" by the internal flows, rather than being sent down the side of the car. So you can't just add back the engine performance and say that's where you "would have been".
Right now Mercedes is the complete opposite of what they were when they were winning, now they talk up their chances every opportunity, the pressure has affected them.
You really think that would be a good look with what Horner is up to these days?
I think Mercedes will get on top if things now that they seem to have the right platform - both Lewis and George have said the car feels better now, but I wonder a little about their claims this earlySevach wrote: ↑03 Mar 2024, 07:27Right now Mercedes is the complete opposite of what they were when they were winning, now they talk up their chances every opportunity, the pressure has affected them. The wrong cooling solution when you’ve had a bunch of tests at the same track. I don’t think that’s the kinda mistake they’d have made in 2014-2021. But I am sure they will learn from it before too long
I can understand Russell, he never drove for the all conquering Mercedes(well... he did for one race), but the rest of the team...
That’s the same louvres they ran in the race. I don’t believe they tested anything more aggressive in any of the practices
Matt2725 wrote: ↑03 Mar 2024, 16:21Just so I'm up to date on this thread. Anything negative is true, and anything potentially positive is PR spin and only being said to attract drivers and sponsors?
I think that's about right. Shame the level of discourse here is now on par with Reddit.
As it is, we'll see where they are next week I would suggest.