We need Williams to up their game to have fights from the oldies
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
We need Williams to up their game to have fights from the oldies
Sainz got greedy going for the move on Leclerc. I get it, he's a racer, but if Ferrari is actually trying to win the WCC, then things have to be different. In the past it was not clear that Ferrari was fighting for anything, but they have a chance here. Sainz is leaving at end of year. There needs to be discipline. That should have been a 2-3 for Ferrari.f1316 wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 19:25And to add to this, as my immediate emotional reactions wear off and my pragmatic brain kicks in more: what disappointments me more than the lost win - which in itself is agonising - is that we managed to drop further back from the lead of the constructors on a weekend where we arguably had the best car. It is what it is but that’s the biggest sore spot for me in hindsight.f1316 wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 18:45Very disappointed - Leclerc’s own analysis was correct. I don’t know why they allowed themselves to be put under so much pressure with such a big lead and don’t know why he didn’t defend harder. A real shame as the win was there. Sigh,
Anyway, we regroup and go again next time. Forza Ferrari.
Ferrari needs to tank in the WCC or at least not win it. They need wind tunnel hours.AR3-GP wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 19:37Sainz got greedy going for the move on Leclerc. I get it, he's a racer, but if Ferrari is actually trying to win the WCC, then things have to be different. In the past it was not clear that Ferrari was fighting for anything, but they have a chance here. Sainz is leaving at end of year. There needs to be discipline. That should have been a 2-3 for Ferrari.f1316 wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 19:25And to add to this, as my immediate emotional reactions wear off and my pragmatic brain kicks in more: what disappointments me more than the lost win - which in itself is agonising - is that we managed to drop further back from the lead of the constructors on a weekend where we arguably had the best car. It is what it is but that’s the biggest sore spot for me in hindsight.f1316 wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 18:45Very disappointed - Leclerc’s own analysis was correct. I don’t know why they allowed themselves to be put under so much pressure with such a big lead and don’t know why he didn’t defend harder. A real shame as the win was there. Sigh,
Anyway, we regroup and go again next time. Forza Ferrari.
Ferrari winning a WCC after almost 20 years is much bigger than any Wind Tunnel hours.
2-3 kph whilst you are already travelling 300kph is massiveXyz22 wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 18:292-3 kp/h is all you need in this case.ScuderiaLeo wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 18:23I think there are 2 aspects to this
1- Leclerc was not confident on the hards which meant he was driving more cautiously. He said in multiple interviews there were times he was afraid of crashing. Logically we can understand this as he wouldn't divebomb since he was already on the edge.
2- McLaren wing issue may have given Piastri an advantage over Leclerc every lap when Leclerc was chasing him, which might've been enough to make the overtake impossible unless Leclerc was going for a very aggressive overtake (and we know he wasn't)
We can't be sure how much the so-called mini DRS impacted Piastri's pace, but I think with the info on hand we can put this one on both sides. It probably did have an effect and it probably did make overtaking more difficult but to say Leclerc would've passed him otherwise is just a big unknown.
They won't win it. Baku was a big Ferrari track and they lost massive amount of points.
You are correct regarding their complacency in the race, but you can't honestly say that it didn't look like we had it in our hands until we didn't. I think at that moment, it was not the wrong decision to not race Piastri very hard, in hindsight, it was of course. We all thought he'd drop off, like he did in the first stint, but it never came. We were outplayed and outsmarted, just like we did it 2 weeks ago. The margins are fine, it happens, and it hurts a lot.Xyz22 wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 19:59They won't win it. Baku was a big Ferrari track and they lost massive amount of points.
Long story short Ferrari (including drivers) was just too confident. They thought they would have won easily when they were leading the race by 6s. Hopefully they will learn from this.
I don't know mate especially knowing how important free air is. I think another driver would have struggled to stay a lot of laps within DRS range and put pressure. Track position is just too important in pretty much every track, providing you don't make an absolutely insane strategy like Leclerc in Hungary.scuderiabrandon wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 20:14You are correct regarding their complacency in the race, but you can't honestly say that it didn't look like we had it in our hands until we didn't. I think at that moment, it was not the wrong decision to not race Piastri very hard, in hindsight, it was of course. We all thought he'd drop off, like he did in the first stint, but it never came. We were outplayed and outsmarted, just like we did it 2 weeks ago. The margins are fine, it happens, and it hurts a lot.Xyz22 wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 19:59They won't win it. Baku was a big Ferrari track and they lost massive amount of points.
Long story short Ferrari (including drivers) was just too confident. They thought they would have won easily when they were leading the race by 6s. Hopefully they will learn from this.
However, I do agree I think the DNF and not winning put us completely out of contention for either championships.
AH, but they were so quick on the straight. I was almost certain being 6 tenths back would've allowed a move, but it didn't. On top of that, he said he couldn't brake as late as Oscar into turn 1. I agree we win that race if we stay ahead, but that is only because I have the benefit of hindsight. He put 6 seconds on Piastri in 14 laps. I thought just get the tyres into a good window, wait for him to drop off and fight our way back. That drop just never came and we couldn't pass on the straight.Xyz22 wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 20:20I don't know mate especially knowing how important free air is. I think another driver would have struggled to stay a lot of laps within DRS range and put pressure. Track position is just too important in pretty much every track, providing you don't make an absolutely insane strategy like Leclerc in Hungary.scuderiabrandon wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 20:14You are correct regarding their complacency in the race, but you can't honestly say that it didn't look like we had it in our hands until we didn't. I think at that moment, it was not the wrong decision to not race Piastri very hard, in hindsight, it was of course. We all thought he'd drop off, like he did in the first stint, but it never came. We were outplayed and outsmarted, just like we did it 2 weeks ago. The margins are fine, it happens, and it hurts a lot.Xyz22 wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 19:59
They won't win it. Baku was a big Ferrari track and they lost massive amount of points.
Long story short Ferrari (including drivers) was just too confident. They thought they would have won easily when they were leading the race by 6s. Hopefully they will learn from this.
However, I do agree I think the DNF and not winning put us completely out of contention for either championships.
Agree on fine margins. I'm really pissed off because we could have won this race quite "easily". It's rare to have a car good enough to win...
Precisely, they were incredible on the hard tyre. I don't think there was a scenario where we won easily, I think Piastri was going to be quick enough to fight even if Leclerc stayed ahead.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 20:48Norris was lapping on leading car pace when he went to pits on 36 lap old hards.
I think Leclerc had the pace to stay ahead "easily" after the warm-up phase.scuderiabrandon wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 21:02Precisely, they were incredible on the hard tyre. I don't think there was a scenario where we won easily, I think Piastri was going to be quick enough to fight even if Leclerc stayed ahead.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 20:48Norris was lapping on leading car pace when he went to pits on 36 lap old hards.
Looks like the pace is so similar it comes down to details.scuderiabrandon wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 21:02Precisely, they were incredible on the hard tyre. I don't think there was a scenario where we won easily, I think Piastri was going to be quick enough to fight even if Leclerc stayed ahead.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 20:48Norris was lapping on leading car pace when he went to pits on 36 lap old hards.