Seems like a typical RB friday for this year. Running underpowered with a car that has poor balance. Sometimes they figure it out overnight, sometimes not. There must be some correlation issues, as the car rarely works out of the box.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑06 Dec 2024, 16:22The car was not turning. Max did a lot of work trying to dial that out but doesn't look like they found a solution in the session. I'm sure they will be faster tomorrow.
I really don't understand it, why for instance couldn't they start with the Qatar setup and work from there, or as that a stupid thought. Are there may be track specific adjustments needed that shifted the handling out of the working range? Then the setup is extremely sensitive to minor changes.napoleon1981 wrote: ↑06 Dec 2024, 19:14Seems like a typical RB friday for this year. Running underpowered with a car that has poor balance. Sometimes they figure it out overnight, sometimes not. There must be some correlation issues, as the car rarely works out of the box.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑06 Dec 2024, 16:22The car was not turning. Max did a lot of work trying to dial that out but doesn't look like they found a solution in the session. I'm sure they will be faster tomorrow.
Yeah, looks like they have big issues in predicting what setup will work on the car.napoleon1981 wrote: ↑06 Dec 2024, 19:14Seems like a typical RB friday for this year. Running underpowered with a car that has poor balance. Sometimes they figure it out overnight, sometimes not. There must be some correlation issues, as the car rarely works out of the box.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑06 Dec 2024, 16:22The car was not turning. Max did a lot of work trying to dial that out but doesn't look like they found a solution in the session. I'm sure they will be faster tomorrow.
You're out of coffee, or what ?PapayaFan481 wrote: ↑06 Dec 2024, 20:32Actually, since you want to take that tone, they have pretrial motions where what is relevant is adjudicated by the judge, in a criminal case and in a civil case the rules are not as tight.Cs98 wrote: ↑06 Dec 2024, 16:16Actually you don't get to just bring in whatever evidence you like to a court room. Things that are not directly relevant to the case but could be perceived as prejudicial are often not allowed, and for good reason. You are trying to ajudicate a specific situation, if both sides are just going to bring in a laundry list of other situations trying to smear the character of the other side that is not conducive to justice in the specific case that is being decided. You can smear George too. Remember what his first instinct was when he caused a super dangerous crash with Valtteri at Imola? He went up to Valtteri as he was in the car, shouted in his face, and slapped him in the head, after a high G crash. Is it a pattern of behaviour with George that he causes dangerous situations and blames the other side, tries to get them penalised? Could be perceived that way.PapayaFan481 wrote: ↑06 Dec 2024, 15:51
In a court of law, lawyers will bring in previous behaviour to build a picture of the character of a person.
That is what George is doing here. Showing a pattern of actions that is indicative of the behaviour of a bully.
That's why you don't bring in other irrelevant situations if you aren't trying to character assassinate.
Remind me which driver got community service for assaulting Ocon in the pits in Brazil? I know it wasn't George. Remind me. Which driver got punished for not being able to control his language in a press conference and then sulked like a petulant child? Remind me which driver can't keep to a delta and then, when punished for breaking the rule tries to deflect by claiming another driver was out of line?
Which was exactly a situation as it was now: yes, Max' response was that of a blunt bully. But that doesn't mean the other party was innocent. Just like George now, Ocon was acting like some golden boy and managed to provoke Max (then more understandably than now), making Max the bully - whilst their own behavior was just as much bullying, just not of the blunt kind.PapayaFan481 wrote: ↑06 Dec 2024, 20:32
Remind me which driver got community service for assaulting Ocon in the pits in Brazil? I know it wasn't George.
ASD? Fine, but don’t use it as an excuse.PapayaFan481 wrote: ↑06 Dec 2024, 20:27Facts are not spam or trolling.
But I guess when you're defending a bully....what else should we expect![]()
You couldn't have missed the point more if you tried. I didn't bring up the George example because I believe George is a bad guy, I'm actually a fan. I brought it up as an example of how you can characterize someone almost any way you like if you get to use every bad situation they've ever been in against them. Arguing in such a way doesn't tell you who was right or wrong in a specific track dispute. It's just bad faith garbage, mudslinging to get at one another in the media. And George has a few skeletons in his closet too if he wants to go down that route. But you missed that point and went straight to mudslinging, again.PapayaFan481 wrote: ↑06 Dec 2024, 20:32Actually, since you want to take that tone, they have pretrial motions where what is relevant is adjudicated by the judge, in a criminal case and in a civil case the rules are not as tight.Cs98 wrote: ↑06 Dec 2024, 16:16Actually you don't get to just bring in whatever evidence you like to a court room. Things that are not directly relevant to the case but could be perceived as prejudicial are often not allowed, and for good reason. You are trying to ajudicate a specific situation, if both sides are just going to bring in a laundry list of other situations trying to smear the character of the other side that is not conducive to justice in the specific case that is being decided. You can smear George too. Remember what his first instinct was when he caused a super dangerous crash with Valtteri at Imola? He went up to Valtteri as he was in the car, shouted in his face, and slapped him in the head, after a high G crash. Is it a pattern of behaviour with George that he causes dangerous situations and blames the other side, tries to get them penalised? Could be perceived that way.PapayaFan481 wrote: ↑06 Dec 2024, 15:51
In a court of law, lawyers will bring in previous behaviour to build a picture of the character of a person.
That is what George is doing here. Showing a pattern of actions that is indicative of the behaviour of a bully.
That's why you don't bring in other irrelevant situations if you aren't trying to character assassinate.
Remind me which driver got community service for assaulting Ocon in the pits in Brazil? I know it wasn't George. Remind me. Which driver got punished for not being able to control his language in a press conference and then sulked like a petulant child? Remind me which driver can't keep to a delta and then, when punished for breaking the rule tries to deflect by claiming another driver was out of line?
organic wrote: ↑07 Dec 2024, 06:02Hopefully the car improves for tomorrow. The continued unpredictability of the car in terms of how it responds to the base setup implies to me they're still having significant correlation issues between the simulator and track. Maybe not something that bodes amazingly for 2025