Aston Martin Honda 2026 speculation etc

This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
User avatar
diffuser
251
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: Aston Martin Honda 2026 speculation etc

Post

Badger wrote:
13 Dec 2025, 20:19
diffuser wrote:
13 Dec 2025, 20:06
Badger wrote:
13 Dec 2025, 18:26

Not true. Merc had better in race deployment from 2023 onwards.
obviously he disagrees, what proof you have of this ?
Seeing the Honda derate more than the Merc for years, especially on high speed tracks.
Like Vegas and Monza that RBR won in 2025?

Anyways I think it's gonna be good enough to win races. if there is a difference between Merc and Honda PU as a whole in 2025, it wasn't more than .05%.

Not a huge fan of that guy. Stuff he says isn't anything new. Stuff like Honda had to completely repackage the PU to fit int the chassis is a little exaggerated. The rules really force the positioning of most parts. All he could really ask is positioning of the radiator/intercooler inlets/outlets and the air intake in the airbox. Even then the compressor has to be near the rear of the ICE. I think the AM will be making the intercooler, I know they make the radiators.

Badger
Badger
3
Joined: 22 Sep 2025, 17:00

Re: Aston Martin Honda 2026 speculation etc

Post

diffuser wrote:
13 Dec 2025, 20:41
Badger wrote:
13 Dec 2025, 20:19
diffuser wrote:
13 Dec 2025, 20:06


obviously he disagrees, what proof you have of this ?
Seeing the Honda derate more than the Merc for years, especially on high speed tracks.
Like Vegas and Monza that RBR won in 2025?

Anyways I think it's gonna be good enough to win races. if there is a difference between Merc and Honda PU as a whole in 2025, it wasn't more than .05%.

Not a huge fan of that guy. Stuff he says isn't anything new. Stuff like Honda had to completely repackage the PU to fit int the chassis is a little exaggerated. The rules really force the positioning of most parts. All he could really ask is positioning of the radiator/intercooler inlets/outlets and the air intake in the airbox. Even then the compressor has to be near the rear of the ICE. I think the AM will be making the intercooler, I know they make the radiators.
Yes, the Honda deployment was particularly bad in Vegas.
Image
You can clearly see that the Honda derates much earlier than the Mercedes. It's consistent throughout the race albeit slightly better in the second stint.

User avatar
diffuser
251
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: Aston Martin Honda 2026 speculation etc

Post

Badger wrote:
13 Dec 2025, 22:32
diffuser wrote:
13 Dec 2025, 20:41
Badger wrote:
13 Dec 2025, 20:19

Seeing the Honda derate more than the Merc for years, especially on high speed tracks.
Like Vegas and Monza that RBR won in 2025?

Anyways I think it's gonna be good enough to win races. if there is a difference between Merc and Honda PU as a whole in 2025, it wasn't more than .05%.

Not a huge fan of that guy. Stuff he says isn't anything new. Stuff like Honda had to completely repackage the PU to fit int the chassis is a little exaggerated. The rules really force the positioning of most parts. All he could really ask is positioning of the radiator/intercooler inlets/outlets and the air intake in the airbox. Even then the compressor has to be near the rear of the ICE. I think the AM will be making the intercooler, I know they make the radiators.
Yes, the Honda deployment was particularly bad in Vegas.
https://i.postimg.cc/7PScMVB9/derate.png
You can clearly see that the Honda derates much earlier than the Mercedes. It's consistent throughout the race albeit slightly better in the second stint.
That's funny, Max pulls away, his engineer get on the radio on lap 11 and says "Max your gap is 1.7 seconds!". Max slows down to help Russell tow to fight Norris and you choose that lap. Lot of cat and mouse going on in races, switching of power modes, etc. Plus When you're leading the race there is no slip stream ... look at lap 44 when Max is closer to col. You can see Max is deploying in different places.

saviour stivala
saviour stivala
46
Joined: 25 Apr 2018, 12:54

Re: Aston Martin Honda 2026 speculation etc

Post

Badger wrote:
13 Dec 2025, 22:32
diffuser wrote:
13 Dec 2025, 20:41
Badger wrote:
13 Dec 2025, 20:19

Seeing the Honda derate more than the Merc for years, especially on high speed tracks.
Like Vegas and Monza that RBR won in 2025?

Anyways I think it's gonna be good enough to win races. if there is a difference between Merc and Honda PU as a whole in 2025, it wasn't more than .05%.

Not a huge fan of that guy. Stuff he says isn't anything new. Stuff like Honda had to completely repackage the PU to fit int the chassis is a little exaggerated. The rules really force the positioning of most parts. All he could really ask is positioning of the radiator/intercooler inlets/outlets and the air intake in the airbox. Even then the compressor has to be near the rear of the ICE. I think the AM will be making the intercooler, I know they make the radiators.
Yes, the Honda deployment was particularly bad in Vegas.
https://i.postimg.cc/7PScMVB9/derate.png
You can clearly see that the Honda derates much earlier than the Mercedes. It's consistent throughout the race albeit slightly better in the second stint.
''Derating - Clipping'' When power unit electrical boost (mgu-k) runs out of stored energy, forcing a 'strategic power reduction on straights, it is not a failure but a calculated strategy to stay within energy deployment rules. The ERS is managed by complex software maps to balance performance and energy limits across a lap. It is not a failure but a calculated strategy energy deployment rules.

AhmerBaig
AhmerBaig
0
Joined: 25 Jun 2024, 14:09

Re: Aston Martin Honda 2026 speculation etc

Post


Badger
Badger
3
Joined: 22 Sep 2025, 17:00

Re: Aston Martin Honda 2026 speculation etc

Post

diffuser wrote:
14 Dec 2025, 03:53
Badger wrote:
13 Dec 2025, 22:32
diffuser wrote:
13 Dec 2025, 20:41


Like Vegas and Monza that RBR won in 2025?

Anyways I think it's gonna be good enough to win races. if there is a difference between Merc and Honda PU as a whole in 2025, it wasn't more than .05%.

Not a huge fan of that guy. Stuff he says isn't anything new. Stuff like Honda had to completely repackage the PU to fit int the chassis is a little exaggerated. The rules really force the positioning of most parts. All he could really ask is positioning of the radiator/intercooler inlets/outlets and the air intake in the airbox. Even then the compressor has to be near the rear of the ICE. I think the AM will be making the intercooler, I know they make the radiators.
Yes, the Honda deployment was particularly bad in Vegas.
https://i.postimg.cc/7PScMVB9/derate.png
You can clearly see that the Honda derates much earlier than the Mercedes. It's consistent throughout the race albeit slightly better in the second stint.
That's funny, Max pulls away, his engineer get on the radio on lap 11 and says "Max your gap is 1.7 seconds!". Max slows down to help Russell tow to fight Norris and you choose that lap. Lot of cat and mouse going on in races, switching of power modes, etc. Plus When you're leading the race there is no slip stream ... look at lap 44 when Max is closer to col. You can see Max is deploying in different places.
You can pick almost any lap in the first stint and it will look like that. Max certainly never slowed to tow anyone, rubbish.

User avatar
diffuser
251
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: Aston Martin Honda 2026 speculation etc

Post

Badger wrote:
14 Dec 2025, 13:43
diffuser wrote:
14 Dec 2025, 03:53
Badger wrote:
13 Dec 2025, 22:32

Yes, the Honda deployment was particularly bad in Vegas.
https://i.postimg.cc/7PScMVB9/derate.png
You can clearly see that the Honda derates much earlier than the Mercedes. It's consistent throughout the race albeit slightly better in the second stint.
That's funny, Max pulls away, his engineer get on the radio on lap 11 and says "Max your gap is 1.7 seconds!". Max slows down to help Russell tow to fight Norris and you choose that lap. Lot of cat and mouse going on in races, switching of power modes, etc. Plus When you're leading the race there is no slip stream ... look at lap 44 when Max is closer to col. You can see Max is deploying in different places.
You can pick almost any lap in the first stint and it will look like that. Max certainly never slowed to tow anyone, rubbish.
He is definitely reminded about the gap by the engineer. That is recorded
Then his lap pace drops by .5 of second, then goes back up.
Like I said Max has no slip stream, leading the race, vs Norris that has two early on then just one later, after Russell pits. That makes a huge difference.

Badger
Badger
3
Joined: 22 Sep 2025, 17:00

Re: Aston Martin Honda 2026 speculation etc

Post

diffuser wrote:
14 Dec 2025, 21:42
Badger wrote:
14 Dec 2025, 13:43
diffuser wrote:
14 Dec 2025, 03:53


That's funny, Max pulls away, his engineer get on the radio on lap 11 and says "Max your gap is 1.7 seconds!". Max slows down to help Russell tow to fight Norris and you choose that lap. Lot of cat and mouse going on in races, switching of power modes, etc. Plus When you're leading the race there is no slip stream ... look at lap 44 when Max is closer to col. You can see Max is deploying in different places.
You can pick almost any lap in the first stint and it will look like that. Max certainly never slowed to tow anyone, rubbish.
He is definitely reminded about the gap by the engineer. That is recorded
Then his lap pace drops by .5 of second, then goes back up.
Like I said Max has no slip stream, leading the race, vs Norris that has two early on then just one later, after Russell pits. That makes a huge difference.
Of course he is being reminded about the gap :lol: He's leading. Why would you assume being told about a gap means, "slow down and give the tow"? What a weird assumption. Why did he pull away from George in the first stint if he wanted to tow him?

Just look at the derating, ignore the top speed. You can clearly see that Max's acceleration stops earlier than Lando on several of the straights, that's because he stops deploying, not slipstream.

User avatar
diffuser
251
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: Aston Martin Honda 2026 speculation etc

Post

Badger wrote:
15 Dec 2025, 15:47
diffuser wrote:
14 Dec 2025, 21:42
Badger wrote:
14 Dec 2025, 13:43

You can pick almost any lap in the first stint and it will look like that. Max certainly never slowed to tow anyone, rubbish.
He is definitely reminded about the gap by the engineer. That is recorded
Then his lap pace drops by .5 of second, then goes back up.
Like I said Max has no slip stream, leading the race, vs Norris that has two early on then just one later, after Russell pits. That makes a huge difference.
Of course he is being reminded about the gap :lol: He's leading. Why would you assume being told about a gap means, "slow down and give the tow"? What a weird assumption. Why did he pull away from George in the first stint if he wanted to tow him?

Just look at the derating, ignore the top speed. You can clearly see that Max's acceleration stops earlier than Lando on several of the straights, that's because he stops deploying, not slipstream.
If you give a tow to Russell, who is in a slower car than the RBR and you're not concerned of him passing you, you negate the DRS speed difference between Russell and Norris and in that way help Russell keep Norris behind. That is why you do that. It's the whole strategy behind a DRS train. It also helps keep Norris in dirty air and increase wear on his tires the whole time he is there. I would also guess it's why Russell pitted so early (the earliest he could in his pit window), just to get out from between them and into clean air.
Image

This is lap 45, You can clearly see that Max is performing lift and coast into turn 14 while Norris is not. Norris is just coming off the throttle and braking while max is lifting off the throttle, waiting 1 or 2 seconds and then braking. It is not running out of deployment, it's more about saving tires. We know the McLaren has a tire advantage.
Image

Anyway, this stuff is all highly speculative, which is why I didn’t want to start snipping graphs of it. There are so many different things going on during a race—drivers are rarely driving flat out lap after lap.

I watch a lot of races just from the driver onboard cameras. Alonso will switch deployment strategies easily five times a race (stuff like STRAT 11, STRAT 5, etc.). That doesn’t count the times he uses the deployment override, which is a button he can press and hold to keep the MGU-K deploying until, well, there’s no more electricity if he wants.

So trying to judge how much deployment a PU has from a series of laps in a race, based on the data we have, is impossible. Plus, when you’re leading a race, you never deplete your battery—you always keep plenty in reserve to defend if you need to.

This brings me back full circle to the YouTube video. The only reason I thought the deployment comment was interesting was because I thought the guy said, “The consensus in the F1 paddock is that Honda has…”. That carries far more weight than you or I looking at F1 tempo data, because they have much more complex ways of measuring each other’s deployment. This is now the opinion of people who have data of all cars that they have compared.