Ferrari SF-26

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Tommy Cookers
Tommy Cookers
659
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 16:55

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Andi76 wrote:
25 Jan 2026, 15:11
... close this topic....
All possible answers and explanations have been given.
and an impossible one - PWM

User avatar
hollus
Moderator
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 01:21
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Agree to disagree, guys. Or get another thread.
It is OK if you really want to discuss the sources of those noises, but then please make a thread. Deletions might happen from here on.
TANSTAAFL

wuzak
wuzak
522
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

The Ferrari front wing active aero looks like it will be very low drag.

But will it work for low drag mode sections that have corners on them?

FittingMechanics
FittingMechanics
16
Joined: 19 Feb 2019, 12:10

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

wuzak wrote:
25 Jan 2026, 17:56
The Ferrari front wing active aero looks like it will be very low drag.

But will it work for low drag mode sections that have corners on them?
Straight mode will have zones where it can be used. I am pretty sure that FIA will play this very cautiously and that those zones will end before any kind of significant corner.

mzso
mzso
72
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

LM10 wrote:
23 Jan 2026, 22:05
mzso wrote:
23 Jan 2026, 21:32
Emag wrote:
23 Jan 2026, 13:05
Is this the only real car we have seen that has an inwashing front wing?
Knowing Ferrari's track record it's the exact wrong direction to develop.
Yes, but there's two.
2017 regulation changes: Ferrari aerodynamically and mechanically the best car initially, just hugely underpowered against the PU of Mercedes.

2022 regulation changes: Ferrari the best car initially and at least on par with the RedBull until TD39 came.

Also, in general Ferrari has had clever car characteristics/details which have been copied regularly in many seasons.
So which track record are you talking about exactly?
This is just your rose tinted view. 2017-18 Ferrari used the cheat factor engines, with extra power, which were only made impossible by 2019, with a huge drop in performance. And this in fact just an example of a wrong direction, with the engine, that was inferior for years because of this, optimizing for the illegal developments.

In 2022 they started with an inferior concept that was abandoned. And they only bagged two easy wins because of Red Bull DNFs. And also the red Red Bull was a fair bit overweight for a while. This was also an obvious wrong direction, which they fully abandoned for Red Bull style sidepods.

Going back to the current car, at least it's easier develop a new front wing if it turns out to be the wrong direction again.

User avatar
Dream Theater
22
Joined: 17 Apr 2012, 11:53
Location: Italy

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

sucof wrote:
25 Jan 2026, 02:27
Badger wrote:
25 Jan 2026, 00:52
dialtone wrote:
25 Jan 2026, 00:41


We're definitely going to disagree, this haas video by bozzi, who always has impeccable sound quality, has the exact same noise.
You'll have to specify when you are hearing it in the Haas video. At the 4 minute mark of the F1 video you posted is definitely a drone sound.
I am an audio engineer, trust me it is Not a drone.
It is completely in sync with the engine and the car, by its pitch and its distance.
And it is also logical, this years cars have a much stronger electric motor, which is driven by PWM technology, and that makes electric motors whine, following its RPM.
I was in Fiorano, and I can tell you that this weird sound is indeed the drone. It was very noticeable and clear hearing it live.

edit: sorry, I wrote this comment before reaching the end of the "weird" sound discussion :D

User avatar
bluechris
9
Joined: 26 Jun 2019, 20:28
Location: Athens

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

mzso wrote:
25 Jan 2026, 19:33
LM10 wrote:
23 Jan 2026, 22:05
mzso wrote:
23 Jan 2026, 21:32


Knowing Ferrari's track record it's the exact wrong direction to develop.
Yes, but there's two.
2017 regulation changes: Ferrari aerodynamically and mechanically the best car initially, just hugely underpowered against the PU of Mercedes.

2022 regulation changes: Ferrari the best car initially and at least on par with the RedBull until TD39 came.

Also, in general Ferrari has had clever car characteristics/details which have been copied regularly in many seasons.
So which track record are you talking about exactly?
This is just your rose tinted view. 2017-18 Ferrari used the cheat factor engines, with extra power, which were only made impossible by 2019, with a huge drop in performance. And this in fact just an example of a wrong direction, with the engine, that was inferior for years because of this, optimizing for the illegal developments.

In 2022 they started with an inferior concept that was abandoned. And they only bagged two easy wins because of Red Bull DNFs. And also the red Red Bull was a fair bit overweight for a while. This was also an obvious wrong direction, which they fully abandoned for Red Bull style sidepods.

Going back to the current car, at least it's easier develop a new front wing if it turns out to be the wrong direction again.
I had asked you again i think, can you point us where is the proof of this? or you came to the thread just to annoy us? I want an official proof of this like the first wings, oil burning from MB etc that the FIA banned the previous years.