Ferrari SF-26

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
AR3-GP
560
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Image
Beware of T-Rex

User avatar
Gridlock
42
Joined: 27 Jan 2012, 04:14

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Monza Mode

(It's doing it again rn just to eliminate any "it's an error" discussion)
#58

Owen.C93
Owen.C93
187
Joined: 24 Jul 2010, 17:52

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

I think someone just coded in +90degree instead of -90 degree rotation.
Motorsport Graduate in search of team experience ;)

Luscion
Luscion
129
Joined: 13 Feb 2023, 01:37

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Last edited by Luscion on 19 Feb 2026, 13:01, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
motobaleno
11
Joined: 31 Mar 2011, 13:58

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

not highlighted yet the simple fact that a rotated downforce wing will likely produce lift meaning first of all a decreased load and friction (with the tarmac) for the rear tyres...apart for eventual aerodynamic drag reduction

nmahrous
nmahrous
0
Joined: 19 Feb 2026, 13:10

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Could this inversion cause more rake on the straights? Benefits the diffuser for more downforce without the drag?

myurr
myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

motobaleno wrote:
19 Feb 2026, 13:00
not highlighted yet the simple fact that a rotated downforce wing will likely produce lift meaning first of all a decreased load and friction (with the tarmac) for the rear tyres...apart for eventual aerodynamic drag reduction
You can actually see the rear wing lift a bit and then squat down again in the full video of the actuation, showing the lift and return to downforce.

It's also going to raise the car slightly at the rear (with the Ferrari sitting low, that'll have a proportionally larger impact), affecting the underfloor aero. Probably a tiny effect but non-zero.

Seanspeed
Seanspeed
7
Joined: 20 Feb 2019, 20:12

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Is the comparatively slow deactivation speed not a huge problem? You want all the downforce you can get the moment you slam on the brakes, so it seems like the ideal situation would be to start the deactivation before you hit the brakes? But that seems like it'd be complicated to setup.

Emag
Emag
133
Joined: 11 Feb 2019, 14:56

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Seanspeed wrote:
19 Feb 2026, 13:19
Is the comparatively slow deactivation speed not a huge problem? You want all the downforce you can get the moment you slam on the brakes, so it seems like the ideal situation would be to start the deactivation before you hit the brakes? But that seems like it'd be complicated to setup.
I was thinking about this actually. It might be a problem for corners which require steering input very quickly after braking (T1 Australia for example). The rear might be less stable for longer than others.

But we have only seen slow-mo videos of the mechanism. Maybe it's fast enough to flip where it's not an issue for most cases.
Developer of F1InsightsHub

FittingMechanics
FittingMechanics
20
Joined: 19 Feb 2019, 12:10

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

I don't think that is an issue, if they want more time they can just lift and coast harvest at the end of straights where SM is available.

Should give them plenty of time. Teams don't throw away free energy by ignoring harvesting at end of straights.

User avatar
RicME85
52
Joined: 09 Feb 2012, 13:11
Location: Derby

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
19 Feb 2026, 08:47
The Ferrari seems to always have this whisp of "smoke" trailing the impact structure.
Its the oil breather, the FIA brought it in when there was the oil burning 'controversy' in 2017. All cars have it. IIRC Ferrari always seemed to produce a more noticeable whisp out the pipe than other PU's during the last PU cycle.

Kalsi
Kalsi
31
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 21:12

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Hot stuff here... Looks like the exhaust flap is blowing really hard.
You can see the breather smoke literally being thrown updards
I dont remember seeing anything like this before

Image
Image

User avatar
sucof
38
Joined: 23 Nov 2012, 12:15

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Are they allowed to use this exact system but rotate the wing conventionally too?
I mean, if yes, they can choose to use a conventional 30-40 degree rotation in certain straights, and a full flip in others where it is more beneficial?

User avatar
matt21
86
Joined: 15 Mar 2010, 13:17

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

venkyhere wrote:
19 Feb 2026, 08:29
ryaan2904 wrote:
19 Feb 2026, 04:07
PlatinumZealot wrote:
19 Feb 2026, 03:24
:idea: I see this as blowing the rear wing!! :idea:
Could you explain? I feel blowing the rear wing is a bit far-fetched. It could just be that they are blowing high energy air upwards to energise the suction from the diffuser and improving diffuser performance
It's blowing the 'gap' between rear wing and diffuser at such an angle that it produces additional suction strong enough to :
- increase the speed of air hitting the underside of rear wing mainplane
- increase the speed of air exiting the diffuser.
Could it be that they are creating an air-curtain to lower the pressure behind the diffusor?

tcli
tcli
0
Joined: 29 Mar 2016, 20:06
Location: France

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post