DJ Downforce wrote: ↑29 Mar 2026, 22:04
woocasz wrote: ↑29 Mar 2026, 20:09
DJ Downforce wrote: ↑29 Mar 2026, 17:16
He made his own luck by keeping the tyres alive in stint one
mate... did you even watch the race?
Are you familiar with terms such as ‘overcut’ and ‘undercut’?
how about Oscar? driving in 1st place, in the free air, did he have to change the tyres because they were worn out?
no!
please stop this nonsense
Im not sure i'm understanding your post. Oscar had graining on the tyres meaning he had to pit. Ham was still doing consistent lap times until the safety car. Everyone has the same opportunity...
Piastri pitted to keep track position. Pitting early hardly helps his second stint if graining was an issue. His discussion with the race engineer just before the pit stop window was all about maintaining track position on George and avoiding being undercut. He essentially communicated he could win as long as he had track position.
Just correcting that point, I have no horse in the Lec vs Hamilton wars.
Hamilton's pace was slower due to a poor setup or an underperforming battery. The people he was racing all pitted early in the pit window, LEC, Nor and Piastri, so staying out and trying something different (hoping for a safety car) was a straightforward option. I don't think he kept his tyres alive any better or worse than anyone else, I think most pitted because track position was key in Japan. Shown by George's inability to get past Charles, even with a 0.3-0.5 second car delta.