ISLAMATRON wrote:After all the results are looked at one must conclude that Alonso has not got any significant results in the last 2 years(except for the fixed race)... and decide for themselves why and what it tells us.
you've got a short memory or what? Or you just see, hear and remember what you want to? After the so called
fixed race he won the next one and was solid 2dn in Brazil, while LH got spanked by Vetel and was a few turns of blowing it badly again.
ISLAMATRON wrote:
What I have concluded for myself, is that Alonso is not as good as many claim and that he has do to do anything spectaular without the Michilin tires as an advantage over his rivals.
again a pointless claim. If I remember right, there were other teams running on Michelin at the time, but your point is the they made special tires for Renault and Alonso? Any proof? Accept it, Alonso is an excellent driver, probably the best out there, and Renault were gaining momentum with him since 2003. When they finally provided him with a winning car, he got the job done. It seems that for some - completely unjustified according to you - reason, most F1 people consider him as very good technically, setting up the car, giving feedback, etc. I ask again, why should we trust you, your opinion, and not what the professionals think?