And how many points does Max have so far from qualifying?f1316 wrote: ↑16 Sep 2017, 18:05I just think it's getting to him that Max is genuinely the quicker driver and that it's consistently showing to be the case.Phil wrote: ↑16 Sep 2017, 17:44Ey? That's a bit harsh. Dan was mighty in FP1 and FP2 and close enough in FP3. What's wrong with genuine disappointment of one of the drivers who possibly thought to have it within grasp to get pole and win on perhaps the best track for RedBull this year?
The Dan vs Max mentioning isn't really necessary IMO.
But my real gripe is that he always acts this way - he doesn't say well done to the guy on pole, like Seb and Lewis (both of whom have supreme confidence in their own ability) do to each other, always his reaction is that it should have been him. It's not good sportsmanship and he's not showing himself to be a good sportsman. IMHO
Don't worry they'll be just as competitive in Malaysia, Ferrari is very strong there, as they have been traditionally, then Mercedes will strike back in Japan, Mexico, and COTA are too close to call, but Brazil will be good for Mercedes as it has long full throttle sections. Abu-Dhabi is a toss up, but I think Ferrari might have the edge there.matt_b wrote: ↑16 Sep 2017, 16:22That Ferrrai always gets pole on tracks that are impossible to overtake (Monaco, Sochi, Hungary, Singapore). It was a mega lap from Seb though hitting the wall with his rear tyre, that gearbox must be made of granite. If it rains which likely we could have a classic race.
No offence but saying that Hamilton is "great at street courses" is almost like someone saying that he's relieved a particular car is in the safe hands of Pastor MaldonadoWaikeCU wrote: ↑05 Sep 2017, 23:56I personally think Hamilton will be mighty here. It all comes down to how the Merc behaves around this circuit. Lewis is great at street courses and if this isn't the best car suited for this track, the driver still can make the difference and with the momentum he has after Spa and Monza, he could be in a different zone. In 2009 the Mclaren certainely wasn't the best car around, but he did put that car on pole in Singapore with a mighty lap and also won the race as well. It all remains to be seen on how the Merc has overcome it's issues early in the season.
PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑06 Sep 2017, 16:52I am sticking my head out. Lewis for pole by a country mile.
Like we've been saying forever.... On power tracks, Force India and Williams are always strong and best of the rest and, on tracks where power is less important, Mclaren, STR and Renault are easily better.
looks to me ferrari have different gears ratio and accelerate faster with more power...vettel have 7-8km/h more before brakes zones..Juzh wrote: ↑16 Sep 2017, 18:53Vettel vs Verstappen:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TETZeENIhU
On this track, where downforce and energy deployment are a non-issue, ferrari PU clearly still has the legs on the renault and is probably almost on mercedes level (speed traps pretty much identical).
Quite the opposite of the situation in monza, where renault's superior ERS certainly made up for lack of ultimate grunt and enabled RB to be faster than ferrari on pace.
That is just sour grapes. On a similar note, where was Vettel in a wet Monza ? Beaten by a FIndia. Beaten by a Williams, which has sucked d0nkey a$$ for years now in wet weather. Beaten by his well past it team mate even.Artur Craft wrote: ↑17 Sep 2017, 00:35![]()
Don't worry, Mercedes will be on a league of it's own again on most of the other tracks and you and the other fans of Hamilton will be able to believe and tell everybody how special you think he is