Oddly, it doesn't seem to have hurt everyone else that badly (halo cog).roon wrote: ↑29 Jun 2018, 00:08https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DgzMnRCWsAAAcbk.jpg
Such a different approach from the other teams. No heat exchangers or ducts other than the snorkel above the top of the fuel tank/monocoque. I speculate this was at least partly about managing the overall vehicle CoG height changes imposed by the halo structure.
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
I am sorry. This only adds fuel to how bad McLaren chassis really is!mclaren111 wrote: ↑28 Jun 2018, 14:05Motorsport.com:
https://cdn-7.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... r-wing.jpg
Even Mercedes is copying McLaren !!
Looks like they are trying to figure out how to tackle next year's regulations.Dipesh1995 wrote: ↑29 Jun 2018, 11:37New front wing without the edge vortex tunnels on the car this morning.
https://mobile.twitter.com/F1/status/10 ... 04/photo/1
Pretty sure they tried something like this in the latter part of 2016.
Edit: They did https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/anal ... rk-841308/
Exactly, that’s what I thought moments after posting. Maybe they’ll also bring some new bargeboards to test in the coming races to reflect the TR changes next year considering their importance in redirecting the front tyre wake away from the rest of the car will significantly increase due to the lack of outwash front wings.turbof1 wrote: ↑29 Jun 2018, 13:33Looks like they are trying to figure out how to tackle next year's regulations.Dipesh1995 wrote: ↑29 Jun 2018, 11:37New front wing without the edge vortex tunnels on the car this morning.
https://mobile.twitter.com/F1/status/10 ... 04/photo/1
Pretty sure they tried something like this in the latter part of 2016.
Edit: They did https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/anal ... rk-841308/