It was that Idiotic Frenchman Boullier... When the car was decent in 2017 he took credit for it. In 2018, when car was terrible, he claimed "I can only race what I'm given"... Thank goodness he's gone...
There's been a lot of negativity towards McLaren during these tests. But for me, the one that takes the cake, (others might see it differently) was when Sky described Lando's off into the gravel as a crash! English isn't my mother tongue, but that seemed like a ridiculous exaggeration.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 10:12Haas impressed with 1:17:8 on C4, while Sainz did a 1:17:1 on C4 on Wednesday. Forgot about that I guess.Xero wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 00:53https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIDTLD1p0dQMansell89 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2019, 23:19Have we got the comparative times for the C3 compound from today? (And C2 if available)
I was quite excited by a C3 lap that Lando did that sat very competitively in the pecking order but just a few mins later everyone started setting lap records on softer rubber so it all kinda got lost in the hype.
Autosport completely glossed over that lap, and even had the nerve to put Haas at the front of the midfield for managing a slower lap time on the C4s! They just can't shake that grudge, huh?
It's funny, they are starting to warm up to McLaren, Edd Straw said the car is decent.
To C5, in theory it should give 1.2s in reality... probably 0.9 faster
Pirelli's tyre gap estimate:
It's just how media works, Ferrari and Mercedes are what needs to grab headlines atm, so BOOM and BLITZ is what does the job for them right now. However in case of McLaren, it is more than just how media works...