They are keeping the hype in check by doing that, and that is a good thing.
They really need to go 1.16 on C5... at least 1.16.7
They are keeping the hype in check by doing that, and that is a good thing.
They really need to go 1.16 on C5... at least 1.16.7
I wish... do you have any data to support that?
I looks like they got speed they were good all of the 2 weeks on speed traps, downforce will come down the line, a big update in Australia will help.
You have a point... but SkyF1 can be misleading with tyro info... I think we should wait for Pireli data. But if it's true, they can go 16.5 on C5 then, maybe even faster.NiyolHuayra wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 11:47The 1:17:4xx Sainz did on C3.
If they want to lead the midfield they have to bring upgrades for melbourneNiyolHuayra wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 11:47I looks like they got speed they were good all of the 2 weeks on speed traps, downforce will come down the line, a big update in Australia will help.
Autosport just now: "Sainz may actually be on the C4s, even this late in testing its tricky to tell the compounds apart."Shader wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 11:49You have a point... but SkyF1 can be misleading with tyro info... I think we should wait for Pireli data. But if it's true, they can go 16.5 on C5 then, maybe even faster.
He was on C5NiyolHuayra wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 11:50Autosport just now: "Sainz may actually be on the C4s, even this late in testing its tricky to tell the compounds apart."
I think so too, but if he did that time on C4... man...fouad1979 wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 11:52He was on C5NiyolHuayra wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 11:50Autosport just now: "Sainz may actually be on the C4s, even this late in testing its tricky to tell the compounds apart."