It was posted a couple pages back
If they run more wing, in theory yes, but car behavior on vet track also depends on more factors, mechanical grip ... ectGround Effect wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 21:23I understand it’s raining now... I’m assuming the team would prefer a wet race?bauc wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 21:01They probably gambled on a wet set-up for tomorrow raceSmallSoldier wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 20:31Interesting that both Mclaren’s were so far away in the speed trap... Probably more downforce in the car? Hope it pays off tomorrow!
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201907 ... 281331.jpg
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Maybe not available on Renault-side...Ground Effect wrote: ↑28 Jul 2019, 13:23Lando starting from the back, changing the K, CE in addition to the faulty battery pack. Wouldn’t it have been more prudent to take an H, turbo and ICE as well? Surely nothing to loose, and the components get added to the pool.
That’s what I thought. I remembered a complaint by Horner regarding a similar incident. This is the aspect that worries me about Renault.lio007 wrote: ↑28 Jul 2019, 13:25Maybe not available on Renault-side...Ground Effect wrote: ↑28 Jul 2019, 13:23Lando starting from the back, changing the K, CE in addition to the faulty battery pack. Wouldn’t it have been more prudent to take an H, turbo and ICE as well? Surely nothing to loose, and the components get added to the pool.
They could still run the new PU without issues till the upgrade is introduced after summer break.