TAG wrote: ↑23 Oct 2020, 18:14
Sieper wrote: ↑23 Oct 2020, 17:50
TAG wrote: ↑23 Oct 2020, 17:28
Let's see if there's consistency, I recall just a couple of races ago an engineer giving Hamilton
incorrect instruction on where he could or couldn't do a practice start. By the rules this should be a 3 place grid penalty for Verstappen. Should not be an issue, but... she show.
There is a difference in driving into a closed pit and expecting someone else to slow down after start finish based on what the engineers says. You can never drive into a closed pits while you can expect someone to slow down after a hot lap.
Clarifying for you in case you missed the meat of my post.
But that was not on engineers advice. It was Hamilton who said I am going to do the start in a different location, OK? Engineer just replied to that, Ok (thinking it would be a meter or two) while in fact Hamilton was going to do that next to the race track. It was his own initiative that brought him in to trouble.
In fact, if you want to bring that argument for wanting 100% consistency, where are the 2 times 2 penalty points that always accompany a 2x5 second penalty. They have been reduced already down to 2x1 which is impossible by rule and later were fully retracted. So in fact that example is a prime example of inconsistency, based on the underlying explanation of the reasoning of the driver, not on the factual infringement. All other 5 second penalties have been accompanied by 2 license points.