Dee wrote: ↑29 Jun 2021, 18:29
dans79 wrote: ↑29 Jun 2021, 18:24
Dee wrote: ↑29 Jun 2021, 18:21
And If Mercedes as seen on the data have improved the engine performance by fixing the derate in this new upgrade, what should happen to them?
Good luck proving a reliability fix directly lead to a performance increase. Chances of being able to prove it are just as likely as being able to prove that Redbull got a performance improvement with their second PU in France!
It's all out in the open and fair play with Honda and RB. Their performance data was seen in Bahrain and is now seen again with the reliability upgrade. Again, If Mercedes are found to have brought increased performance to an engine, what should happen?
The PU data isn't out in the open. No PU manufacture has access to another manufactures Data. The only thing the other teams can see is GPS data. performance increases seen in the gps data can be masked and hand waved away in hundreds of different ways. A new front or rear wing design, A new floor, or changes to the floor, or any number of other aero changes. A different approach to setting up the suspension, a different radiator design etc etc etc.
Look at The Ferrari PU debacle things were blatantly obvious in the GPS data, but no team could prove anything definitely.
For example this is how Honda hand waved away the Performance increase seen with the second power unit in france.
https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/red-b ... s/6597112/
Honda F1 technical director Toyoharu Tanabe reckoned that while Red Bull was pushing with updates to improve the car, any engine gains were probably down to better energy management.
"On the team side we are introducing new parts so that we can evolve every race," he said. "The power unit is the same [specification] all the time, but we are learning better how to use energy management etc. for every race.
"We are looking at the characteristics of each circuit, and I think that such daily developments are connected to the current improvement."
Just like in politics all you need is plausible deniability, and the quote above does that!