We also have Lawson holding up Tsunoda for half the race for P5 in Baku.
We also have Lawson holding up Tsunoda for half the race for P5 in Baku.
The one with most points at the end. Everything else is subjective. It's the whole package, including being in the right team. Just look at Alonso.
So what? There's no relation whatsoever... It doesn't matter which car you drive if it breaks down, or the team puts you in a loosing situation, etc. Not that the MCL39 was ever neat as much above the field as the Red Bull two years ago, or Mercedes in most of the championship winning years.AR3-GP wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025, 22:11Unlucky? He's driving an MCL39.Artur Craft wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025, 22:07If Norris wasn´t so unlucky on Holland, he would have been champion already in Vegas(maybe Mclaren wouldn´t have risked so much with Lando having a huge lead, as he should have)
Austria was a coincidence. And Qatar doesn't even qualify. He lost points he didn't want to lose.Artur Craft wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025, 21:54It´s incredible how Andy Ant has screwed Max over this season. First, he wrecked him out on lap 1 of RB´s home race and now he chokes in front of Norris giving him the benefit of finishing P3 to become champion in Abu Dhabi.
Upon SC=>green on lap10, there were 47 laps to 'pull away from Max and squeeze in a 22 (or was it 25) seconds pitstop' on Max. That would have meant ~0.5s/lap pace advantage over him. Perhaps they thought they had it/more sufficiently. In reality it was more like ~0.3s advantage for Piastri & ~0.05s advantage for Norris, over Max. Whether it was them having less pace / Max having more pace, w.r.t their estimated numbers, we won't know. But they played with fire, and got burnt.Skywalker12 wrote: ↑01 Dec 2025, 11:53They committed on doing 50 laps with two stops, while everyone else had one stop. Not sure how they planned to gain back 25-6s on Max, when they were 2-3 tenths faster at best.
He did far more than Norris this year for it, Norris was just blundering around for 3/4 of the season...Artur Craft wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025, 22:24So what? Every season someone gets to drive the best car and Mclaren is nowhere near as dominant as Mercedes, for instance, from 2014-2021. Without his car failure on Netherlands, Lando would have been champion already. Oscar would be a horrible champion, he doesn´t deserve it
It wasn't eve a dominant car. It was a faster car. Earlier in the year. Nowadays depending how set-ups turn out it's either slightly faster or slightly slower than the Red Bull.
The last time McLaren was dominant was in the 80s. The last time an F1 car was dominant was in 2023, the Red Bull.
I’d say the vegas McLaren update in 2024 made it a dominant car. They were easily faster than the others.mzso wrote: ↑01 Dec 2025, 13:27It wasn't eve a dominant car. It was a faster car. Earlier in the year. Nowadays depending how set-ups turn out it's either slightly faster or slightly slower than the Red Bull.
The last time McLaren was dominant was in the 80s. The last time an F1 car was dominant was in 2023, the Red Bull.
By "bastardized", you mean a handling that's good and not with an insane characteristic...PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑01 Dec 2025, 02:58He is one with his car. Do not underestimate that Max and RedBull has honed a driving characteristic to a his, the number 1 driver's liking, over several consecutive years. In contrast other teams have two competing drivers and not even the same drivers for any stretch of time so you get a car whose handling DNA is bastardised.
You can see from the onboards, from trackside even more how much in control Max is and how much front end grip that car has when it's on song.
If you bite your nails out of boredom. The race was decided in Lap 7. After that you only had the prescribed pit stops, which everyone did together. And Piastri deciding in desperation to change tires early, when the race was done and dusted already.CHT wrote: ↑01 Dec 2025, 03:20One of the most nail biting race of the reason from start to finish. Without the 25 lap tire limit, the race would have been less exciting.
Lap 7 SC pit stop was timed to perfection with 25 + 25 to complete the race, not a lap short or extra.
Mclaren thought by not pitting, they have the soft tire option to play, but it was hard that really deliver on this track.
Flawless drive from Max and its situation like this that he always deliver. Masterclass.
Strange comment. McLaren owned completely the first half of the season until Monza. With two good drivers and decent strategies, this could have been only 1-2 finishes excluding Kanada and even in Kanada one needs to ask the question what would have been possible without fumbling Q3.mzso wrote: ↑01 Dec 2025, 13:27It wasn't eve a dominant car. It was a faster car. Earlier in the year. Nowadays depending how set-ups turn out it's either slightly faster or slightly slower than the Red Bull.
The last time McLaren was dominant was in the 80s. The last time an F1 car was dominant was in 2023, the Red Bull.
basti313 wrote: ↑01 Dec 2025, 14:04Strange comment. McLaren owned completely the first half of the season until Monza. With two good drivers and decent strategies, this could have been only 1-2 finishes excluding Kanada and even in Kanada one needs to ask the question what would have been possible without fumbling Q3.mzso wrote: ↑01 Dec 2025, 13:27It wasn't eve a dominant car. It was a faster car. Earlier in the year. Nowadays depending how set-ups turn out it's either slightly faster or slightly slower than the Red Bull.
The last time McLaren was dominant was in the 80s. The last time an F1 car was dominant was in 2023, the Red Bull.
Same, not only faster, but dominant pace they held in Maxico, Brazil and Qatar, but fumbled with at least one car in all of these. Especially Qatar showed this in the first stint, they gapped the competition on older tires by a large margin.
I think it is simply wrong to talk down this car. This is clearly one of the best cars in F1 history, clearly the best of this rule set.