Probably you don't make difference between MGU-H and MGU-K. If I remember this was first MGU-K failure this season.
"Even McLaren was faster than us today, to be honest," said Kvyat, whose team is still 29 points ahead of McLaren in the standings. "I think they were looking very strong.
"I think they were focusing more on the corners with their set-up so I was able to stay closer and it was much harder for him [Vandoorne] to stay with the tow with me, but at the Parabolica they were so close he was able to stay close and I had to close the line every lap.
"It wasn't easy. It's a bit alarming if McLaren can stay with us in this kind of track. There's a lot to do and we need to start working on developing the strong point of the car."
Interesting point. What makes you think McLaren will have the fourth best chassis in 2019 and Red Bull will have the best chassis?HPD wrote: ↑03 Sep 2017, 17:34I think it will be better to be with Toro Rosso in 2018 and Red Bull in 2019.
Honda has more chances to win champion with Red Bull
Honda (second or third best engine) + Mclaren (fourth best chassis) = No victories.
Honda (second or third best engine) + Red Bull (the best chassis) = Victories.
The dawn is comingFrukostScones wrote: ↑03 Sep 2017, 17:35If AMUS rumors is right McLaren will file divorce tomorrow.
It's just a personal opinion, not to offend other fans.Dipesh1995 wrote: ↑03 Sep 2017, 17:43Interesting point. What makes you think McLaren will have the fourth best chassis in 2019 and Red Bull will have the best chassis?HPD wrote: ↑03 Sep 2017, 17:34I think it will be better to be with Toro Rosso in 2018 and Red Bull in 2019.
Honda has more chances to win champion with Red Bull
Honda (second or third best engine) + Mclaren (fourth best chassis) = No victories.
Honda (second or third best engine) + Red Bull (the best chassis) = Victories.
Kvyat is right. Considering the nature of this track, performance was promising. And the good news is, there is much more to come from the engine (spec4 inbound?), and we're heading for circuits that should suit the package much better! Progress of Honda has been huge.Sayeman wrote: ↑03 Sep 2017, 17:39See it's all not that bad. "Kvyat says McLaren's pace at Monza alarming" ..
"Even McLaren was faster than us today, to be honest," said Kvyat, whose team is still 29 points ahead of McLaren in the standings. "I think they were looking very strong.
"I think they were focusing more on the corners with their set-up so I was able to stay closer and it was much harder for him [Vandoorne] to stay with the tow with me, but at the Parabolica they were so close he was able to stay close and I had to close the line every lap.
"It wasn't easy. It's a bit alarming if McLaren can stay with us in this kind of track. There's a lot to do and we need to start working on developing the strong point of the car."
Renault said 2018 PU upgrade will be more conservative compare to 2017, as global design is now frozen and supply chain relationship being put under control. Renault said performance of 2017 is puzzled with reliability (part of them due to new elements and mixability issue, to avoid penalities), and probably some SW control to be tuned due to some bad correlation with track operation. So, their is still some potential to release for 2017 PU, with better component mix and SW update, and another power boost is expected for 2018 version. This version is under heavy test on dyno for months at viry, because they want to master reliabilty, and the next version is also on test. I don't know if they will close completly the gap with merco and ferrari PU, but renault is improving , an defintely not in the same situationy as Honda.Mattchu wrote: ↑03 Sep 2017, 14:12This whole thing has become such a mess that i`m now leaning [and i hate to say it] towards the side that hopes Mclaren divorces Honda and then the Honda engine comes good!
We have seen this weekend with the Renault engine how it is very difficult to make certain parts of these PU`s reliable (when they have to perfrom to such a high level). How many Renault PU parts are being replaced/failing this weekend?
Also i`m sure i read somewhere that Renault are going for a radicalish change in PU design for next year. What makes anyone certain that they aren`t going to go through exactly the same reliability problems that Honda seem to be going through. Why would having a Renauly engine suddenly make them podium contenders, you`d still probably have Merc and Ferrari above them, they would basically be battling Red-Bull, FI, Williams and potentially Renault themselves for best of the rest.
Also how would they be able to keep Alonso if as reported Honda pay most of his wages. They would also lose any extra money Honda put into the team and we all know the McLaren isn`t exactly overflowing with sponsor logos nowadays!
There is no magic bullet available (imo)...
I believe Honda will left McLaren as soon as they did good PU because of McLaren's attitude.HPD wrote: ↑03 Sep 2017, 17:34I think it will be better to be with Toro Rosso in 2018 and Red Bull in 2019.
Honda has more chances to win champion with Red Bull
Honda (second or third best engine) + Mclaren (fourth best chassis) = No victories.
Honda (second or third best engine) + Red Bull (the best chassis) = Victories.
I don’t recall McLaren ever saying that, maybe my memory isn’t so great but imo, I think it’s very difficult to predict what’s going to happen even next year never mind two years down the line. Who could have predicted such an upturn in Ferrari’s form compared to last year? Most people were expecting it to be Mercedes vs Red Bull for the title and that hasn’t been the case.HPD wrote: ↑03 Sep 2017, 17:47It's just a personal opinion, not to offend other fans.Dipesh1995 wrote: ↑03 Sep 2017, 17:43Interesting point. What makes you think McLaren will have the fourth best chassis in 2019 and Red Bull will have the best chassis?HPD wrote: ↑03 Sep 2017, 17:34I think it will be better to be with Toro Rosso in 2018 and Red Bull in 2019.
Honda has more chances to win champion with Red Bull
Honda (second or third best engine) + Mclaren (fourth best chassis) = No victories.
Honda (second or third best engine) + Red Bull (the best chassis) = Victories.
But Red Bull says they do not need the best engine, they just need a good engine and that Red Bull will be in charge of reducing the gap with the chassis gain.
While Mclaren says they need the best engine to win.
I think the key points are made in the second paragraph of Kyvat’s dialogue. McLaren have been making all the time up through the corners; certainly that’s what’s suggested from the speed traps of each sector looking at Alonso’s FP2 lap (https://twitter.com/RenaultSportF1/stat ... 7177375744). Honda have made progress of sorts, I wouldn’t say huge because they’re massively down on power and don’t have great reliability. Vandoorne couldn’t even pass Kvyat despite of being in DRS range with a tow and Kvyat only having a Renault PU.McL-H wrote: ↑03 Sep 2017, 17:49Kvyat is right. Considering the nature of this track, performance was promising. And the good news is, there is much more to come from the engine (spec4 inbound?), and we're heading for circuits that should suit the package much better! Progress of Honda has been huge.Sayeman wrote: ↑03 Sep 2017, 17:39See it's all not that bad. "Kvyat says McLaren's pace at Monza alarming" ..
"Even McLaren was faster than us today, to be honest," said Kvyat, whose team is still 29 points ahead of McLaren in the standings. "I think they were looking very strong.
"I think they were focusing more on the corners with their set-up so I was able to stay closer and it was much harder for him [Vandoorne] to stay with the tow with me, but at the Parabolica they were so close he was able to stay close and I had to close the line every lap.
"It wasn't easy. It's a bit alarming if McLaren can stay with us in this kind of track. There's a lot to do and we need to start working on developing the strong point of the car."
Red Bull are way in front of Mclaren indeed. But thats not all down to the PU. Mclaren won't beat red bull with equal engines.GoranF1 wrote: ↑03 Sep 2017, 15:26Are you insane? Alonso and Riciardo started on the same place on the grid.Mansell89 wrote: ↑03 Sep 2017, 15:23Honestly think McLaren becoming a Renault customer is about as embarrassing as it gets.
Small performance increase, huge reliability risk, no likelihood of race wins.
All I can think is that they're looking to pinch a podium or two for marketing reasons until the engine regs change in a couple of years.
Renault much better engine and even better next year.
Honda? Probably another step back just like in early 2016 and 2017.
It's all chassis, just watch the interview with Zak Brown. Progress has been (too) little to have faith that it will work out fine in the future. They couldn't even overtake the STR, which is one of the draggiest cars on track.McL-H wrote: ↑03 Sep 2017, 17:49Kvyat is right. Considering the nature of this track, performance was promising. And the good news is, there is much more to come from the engine (spec4 inbound?), and we're heading for circuits that should suit the package much better! Progress of Honda has been huge.Sayeman wrote: ↑03 Sep 2017, 17:39See it's all not that bad. "Kvyat says McLaren's pace at Monza alarming" ..
"Even McLaren was faster than us today, to be honest," said Kvyat, whose team is still 29 points ahead of McLaren in the standings. "I think they were looking very strong.
"I think they were focusing more on the corners with their set-up so I was able to stay closer and it was much harder for him [Vandoorne] to stay with the tow with me, but at the Parabolica they were so close he was able to stay close and I had to close the line every lap.
"It wasn't easy. It's a bit alarming if McLaren can stay with us in this kind of track. There's a lot to do and we need to start working on developing the strong point of the car."
But you do expect that Honda will produce a better engine than Ferrari or Mercedes in the next three years, makes no sense at all. McLaren feels it can compete with Red Bull and their information is actually based on data, instead of guessing.NathanOlder wrote: ↑03 Sep 2017, 18:02Red Bull are way in front of Mclaren indeed. But thats not all down to the PU. Mclaren won't beat red bull with equal engines.GoranF1 wrote: ↑03 Sep 2017, 15:26Are you insane? Alonso and Riciardo started on the same place on the grid.Mansell89 wrote: ↑03 Sep 2017, 15:23Honestly think McLaren becoming a Renault customer is about as embarrassing as it gets.
Small performance increase, huge reliability risk, no likelihood of race wins.
All I can think is that they're looking to pinch a podium or two for marketing reasons until the engine regs change in a couple of years.
Renault much better engine and even better next year.
Honda? Probably another step back just like in early 2016 and 2017.